SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10921 222 0 LRCX
Emcee:  Cary Salsberg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9346WT - thanks for a thoughtful contribution. I agree that there is much reason fowillcousa-1/20/2001
9345I think you and most market bulls are over simplifying the economic situation anWTSherman-1/20/2001
9344You probably should have waited for the next semi-equipment book-to-bill ratio bQualified Opinion-1/20/2001
9343I was referring to the economy in general. My belief is that we've had a briscott_jiminez-1/20/2001
9342How can it be a textbook recovery when we haven't had a textbook decline in Math Junkie-1/20/2001
9341<i> If the front end continues to weather the downturn better than the bacscott_jiminez-1/19/2001
9340Scott, i agree with u on that if you buy now you can get 100% in the future (inHenry D-1/19/2001
9339Heads up; Message 15211919Mark Adams-1/19/2001
9338Scott, my hubris-alert program has flagged this ><i>This is not rocket-Gottfried-1/19/2001
9337Jerome, I hate to say it but maybe Ms. Market really knows more than we do.willcousa-1/19/2001
9336Nope. The events panned out just as I portrayed. AMAT, NVLS, etc DID receive moscott_jiminez-1/19/2001
9335Right now, the TA indicates a "bear market" rally, with just few breakZeev Hed-1/19/2001
9334scott, on the KLIC thread, you posted something to the effect that AMAT and NVLHenry D-1/19/2001
9333But when TA is buy the inverse contrary indicator rule takes over. This is in descott_jiminez-1/19/2001
9332Zeev, I thought when TA and FA disagree, we should follow TA. So, has TA put iSampat Saraf-1/19/2001
9331It's really not so complicated...regardless of mighty tomes of explanations scott_jiminez-1/19/2001
9330I am not sure anyone can explain this sector too well. But when they started to Zeev Hed-1/19/2001
9329Hi, Maybe you can explain the semi-equips to me. A few months ago, they were fRoss-1/18/2001
9328Gottfried, a gravestone doji must be followed by a down day to be an effective sZeev Hed-1/18/2001
9327<i>With the Calls, one has a measurable risk of losing everything.</i&gJerome-1/18/2001
9326<<i>Something like a teenager coming home late at night and say, "WTSherman-1/18/2001
9325<i>That is not the kind of information that leads to sustained upward moveJerome-1/18/2001
9324Now let's all try to remember, if this is indeed the beginning of a new cyclscott_jiminez-1/18/2001
9323<<i>Any good theories to explain this phenomenon? <</i> ExcesWTSherman-1/18/2001
9322serg, thanks. I think I'll get to the fancy options later. I'm just learGottfried-1/18/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):