SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Iomega Thread without Iomega
An SI Board Since June 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10072 15 0 IOM
Emcee:  Jock Hutchinson Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9397 ***OT*** Ken, I heard a rumor that you're the new WEBMASTER... any truth tsheila rothstein-4/23/1999
9396 Nice sweet ads for the sweet microtek scanner/zip all over mags!!!! s. bateh-4/23/1999
9395 Hey! If Rocky says it, it must be true, and that settles it. So I believe it. JFuzzFace-4/23/1999
9394 >>RE: Flop! Drive ...Excellent post on The Motely Fool! This post is a MCogito-4/23/1999
9393 >>(2) middle end - digital cams. Camera users will transfer pictures direCogito-4/23/1999
9392 >>My point is that the market will eventually split into three:<< Pacing The Cage-4/23/1999
9391 << Tell that to the people who are buying the $7000 Nikon E3 >> SoKen Pomaranski-4/23/1999
9390 SyQuest changes name to SYQT, common stock shareholders will receive nothing. Troy Shaw-4/23/1999
9389 "My point is that the market will eventually split into three: [1 & 2 Cameron Dorey-4/23/1999
9388 << My own situation: 2 kids, it costs $6 for a roll of film $10 processinKen Pomaranski-4/23/1999
9387 John F stop determines the depth of field. The higher the number, ie. f16 or fZebedee Wright, Jr.-4/23/1999
9386 John, <i>OT: How does one alter depth of field with a digital camera?<David Colvin-4/23/1999
9385 OT: How does one alter depth of field with a digital camera ? John Solder-4/23/1999
9384 Craig, <i>This would be great news. If this happens, it would allow photDavid Colvin-4/23/1999
9383 Good point, my wife and I are forking over lots of bucks on film and processingDavid Harker-4/23/1999
9382 How many people now own scanners for their home computers ? They are not cheapJohn Solder-4/23/1999
9381 Mel, In view of Michael's logic.....unless Iomega puts out some other &quoDavid Colvin-4/23/1999
9380 Ken, Good point about the potential market for Clik. However, if photo develCraig Richards-4/23/1999
9379 << Has anyone heard about plans for this type of Clik supported film devKen Pomaranski-4/23/1999
9378 David, its only a guess, but I believe that these figures will be revealed in tMel Boreham-4/23/1999
9377 <i>Reportedly, several manufacturers will announce digital cameras that sCraig Richards-4/23/1999
9376 Anything is possible. I doubt another company would be interested in IOM in thJohn Solder-4/23/1999
9375 is it possible that IOM will fall into other hands. Many companies are now aquiDave Triplett-4/23/1999
9374 From the web Motley Fool board, The poster (Vin) said, "I liked the sounDavid Colvin-4/23/1999
9373 Mel, <i>David and Michael, you may have already seen this, but I haven&#David Colvin-4/23/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News