SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Wind River going up, up, up!
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10309 186 0 WIND
Emcee:  Allen Benn Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9459<i> "By running a Java Embedded Server (JES) on top of Wind RiverStarlight-4/6/2001
9458Do you have a link to the "journal" you mention? TIA wssteinman-4/6/2001
9457I took a look at that recent WR Hambrect report. In it they quote some emmbeddepeters01-4/6/2001
9456WIND up 10% today, The Masters on the tube...time to savour Life's sweet litCarpe per Diem-4/5/2001
9455I was reading some of the posts at slashdot.org. It was kind of surprising, as mDavid Evans-4/5/2001
9454Aritcle about time to market and the need for more tools. Survey finds embeddedJames Connolly-4/5/2001
9453WR Hambrecht and Co Issues Comments on WIND investor.cnet.comJakeStraw-4/5/2001
9452Jerry Fiddler to discuss acquisitions on Y! FinanceVision at 12:15 today... JasJason W-4/5/2001
9451Your experience with recompiles agrees precisely with mine. Something always goeAllen Benn-4/5/2001
9450WIND news is in dead tree edition of WSJ today, a plus. JasonJason W-4/5/2001
9449Wind River Systems Rated New `Buy' at Needham & Co. By Sybil Carlson PriSteven L. Whitehurst-4/5/2001
9448Thanks for your (as always) thoughtful and informative post. Once I saw the GPLPrognosticator-4/5/2001
9447<I>It would seem that the potential benefits from capturing a large share Allen Benn-4/4/2001
9446Allen, could you share some color on the other acquisition? It would seem that Brian Lempel-4/4/2001
9445<I>why FreeBSD and not Linux. This is a blunder IMO.</I> As your suAllen Benn-4/4/2001
9444See my followup message. I got that from the CC, I should have recognized it anyPrognosticator-4/4/2001
9443They can't buy a linux company because of the licensing issues behind them. David Evans-4/4/2001
9442Well, listening to the conference call replay, it's starting to make a bit mPrognosticator-4/4/2001
9441It certainly seems to be a reaction to the embedded Linux threat, and the fact tBill Fischofer-4/4/2001
9440If they are trying to address the Linux issue, they are disguising it well by buPrognosticator-4/4/2001
9439>>Short term, these all cash acquisitions will be mildly dilutive in the fDavid Evans-4/4/2001
9438Short term, these all cash acquisitions will be mildly dilutive in the first 2Q Carpe per Diem-4/4/2001
9437Double Damn! The webcast is oversubscribed. Anyone listening in, please post noPrognosticator-4/4/2001
9436OK, on the BSDI acquisition: why FreeBSD and not Linux. This is a blunder IMO. Prognosticator-4/4/2001
9435Eonic Headquarter: Belgium.lkj-4/4/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):