SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Merck
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1580 80 0 MRK
Emcee:  Alfred W. Post Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
955 I like IMNR and CYPH as small drugs ,, AMGN , I think could go well .. so is AGTokyoMex-7/23/1998
954 I believe your reasoning is sound esp since mrk guided analysts in the future eJohn Carragher-7/23/1998
953 Thanks, nice informative post. I believe the recent bad news will indeed speeaknahow-7/23/1998
952 From a Biotech ,, whiz kid 9 reasons not to buy MRK ..... Merck took a tumble TokyoMex-7/22/1998
951 takes two to make a market. I sold some mrk last week and bought lly. I have John Carragher-7/22/1998
950 I also was talked out of Merck about a year ago, but traded for GE and MicrosofMaxer-7/21/1998
949 Smith Barney's Christina Heuer is among the "analysts" who recommHoyaBob-7/21/1998
948 What's the big deal? Merck gained the eight points in the last week or so.Maxer-7/21/1998
947 Other drug companies are having blow out earnings and growth and MRK misses so HiSpeed-7/21/1998
946 exactly.. but I just added by buying lly. I wanted to get a couple of theseJohn Carragher-7/21/1998
945 were earnings really this bad?? It looks like movements foreign exchange were Rob L.-7/21/1998
944 down 7 bucks I guess the momentum guys are going elsewhere. But a disappointJohn Carragher-7/21/1998
943 I had merck during the last split. I don't recall any permission letter. Maxer-7/17/1998
942 Re: last 3 splits per Zacks . . . 5/26/92 3 for 1 5/26/88 3 for 1 5/23/86 2 PerryA-7/16/1998
941 Take a look at merck.com!!uMykH1FF4uMynB0VSb/finance/finnews.htm According to Mduncan moyer-7/15/1998
940 <<they can always ask shareholders to authorize to increase share David C. Burns-7/15/1998
939 they can always ask shareholders to authorize to increase share numbers. many Nancy-7/15/1998
938 Do we have a techie in the audience who can sort by stock split and see how manJohn Carragher-7/15/1998
937 I may be mistaken, but I thought the last time MRK split was at 150-180 (pre-19Rob L.-7/15/1998
936 <<so MRK has never split since 1992 till now ???>> Reviewing the ADavid C. Burns-7/15/1998
935 so MRK has never split since 1992 till now ??? i know MRK has said last year tNancy-7/15/1998
934 << mrk last time split was 3-1 around 150, about 2 years ago ??? >>David C. Burns-7/15/1998
933 mrk last time split was 3-1 around 150, about 2 years ago ??? Nancy-7/15/1998
932 Only rumor (but what the hey): Merck detail man heard from his own company graHoyaBob-7/14/1998
931 mrk GG (july 135) <G>... we do get lucky i guess. any one know about splSonki-7/14/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News