Technical Analysis - Beginners | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends
Technical Analysis - Beginners

An SI Board Since September 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
12039	217	0

Emcee: gonzongo	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
9564	Michael, That would be too easy for Nicholas. He just wants "The guru'	Sean W. Smith	-	2/25/1999
9563	Hello Dave Something for all new and seasoned TAers and tribute. This seem	Tom Halkar	-	2/25/1999
9562	Mike Does os/ob mean oversold and overbought? Is there an indicator in MSWiN	Tom Halkar	-	2/25/1999
9561	Bravo! This can be such a killer thread! Great volume discussion... bdog	bdog	-	2/25/1999
9560	Don't know what to add, after reading the responses :o) Lots of good insigh	Lawrence Burg	-	2/25/1999
9559	Yes I prefer flat range but anytime volume falls to extreme low levels, I start	Richard Estes	-	2/25/1999
9558	Depending on your approach to the markets, volume may or not be relevant. I agr	Robert Graham	-	2/24/1999
9557	Nicholas, here is one current example of the use of volume. In this chart of L	Vitas	-	2/24/1999
9556	Yes, volume can fill in part of the picture that price cannot by itself. Still,	Robert Graham	-	2/24/1999
9555	Most of my buys come from some form of a breakout where I like to see big volum	big run	-	2/24/1999
9554	In trying to measure it, I say low risk breakouts can come within a day or two	Richard Estes	-	2/24/1999
9553	Richard...I recall you like volume declines, which goes against my methods. But	big run	-	2/24/1999
9552	Nick* I like Allan's concise analogy. Here's another (slighly less so)	Craig DeHaan	-	2/24/1999
9551	Nicholas, Why don't <i>you</i> check out a few dozen, or hundr	Michael Watkins	-	2/24/1999
9550	<I>Are you therefore saying it's best to ignore volume?</I>	Allan Harris	-	2/24/1999
9549	"I can not agree that complexity is negative, a logically developed indica	TA2K	-	2/24/1999
9548	"Volume pattern = limp left wrist keeps getting in the way." Are you	TA2K	-	2/24/1999
9547	Yes, volume is important, but I'd stop short of saying "enormously sup	CatLady	-	2/24/1999
9546	I think he was quoting Richard from post #9497. (eom)	CatLady	-	2/24/1999
9545	Let's take a step back for a minute.... You just got through saying that on	David R. Evans	-	2/24/1999
9544	But I suggest you look at a chart, the buys come on a contraction of price and	Richard Estes	-	2/24/1999
9543	I look at price..... I use a volume calc. in DNS but it is one of eight indicat	David R. Evans	-	2/24/1999
9542	<I>Doing the latter is like a boxer entering the ring figuring he can do	Allan Harris	-	2/24/1999
9541	Nicholas, yes, always, always look at volume. bdog	bdog	-	2/24/1999
9540	I think I had a glimmer of insight today. I'm wondering if some of you can	TA2K	-	2/24/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):