SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2484 45 0 LUMM
Emcee:  Currency Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
959 John, Looks like your another lazy person not willing to do some work. Check RBRCDTD-10/3/1999
958 R???? Who R you???? . . . and how is it that you were able to spend so much John K_k-10/3/1999
957 SCAMM!! Short all you can. In a few months this company will be non-existent...realmoney-10/3/1999
956 CJ Q, I don't think MOLEX will partner up with a hoax and neither would a RCDTD-10/2/1999
955 I heard LUMM from my hoax buster friend since I have been in this DWDM industryCJ Quantumwell-10/2/1999
954 This link to their web site provides some limited information on their proposedP Wright-10/2/1999
953 CJQ; Lots of questions, to which I have no answers, but I'm looking for theDon Johnstone-10/2/1999
952 Hi Don, Please explain what DWDM chip do they have. DWDM this word is too vaguCJ Quantumwell-10/1/1999
951 Thanks for the response. I understand the reason for Molex to be represented onnord-9/28/1999
950 In partial response to your questions, MFO (Molex Fiber Optics), the fastest grQbit-9/28/1999
949 Indeed, it reeks like a bum's piss steaming of a hot sidewalk. Anyone thMr. Pink-9/28/1999
948 I have been reading the posts on this thread and spending time doing my backgrnord-9/28/1999
947 An explanation from The Ottawa Citizen on LUMM with reference to JDS Uniphase, Don Johnstone-9/28/1999
946 <i>We [and I can't take the credit, or blame, for this], think the prrealmoney-9/28/1999
945 Mr>P$^k, LUMM scent is fishlike, perhaps akin to a red herring in the sun ovynot-9/27/1999
944 <<why do you suppose LUMM has not been snapped up>> That's a gDon Johnstone-9/27/1999
943 Interesting company. Mr. P-nkMr. Pink-9/27/1999
942 Thanks Don. Great info and much appreciated. Thanks for sharing. RogerRoger Lewis-9/27/1999
941 Don, why do you suppose LUMM has not been snapped up by a company the likes of c. carlson-9/27/1999
940 Thanx for this input. It solidifies my confidence in Lumenon's future succQbit-9/27/1999
939 Hi all, i've been in LUMM since February, but never felt the need to post uvinh pham-9/26/1999
938 JC, LUMM's CFO has been working on the financial review for the NASDAQ applDon Johnstone-9/26/1999
937 Mike, I don't know for sure but assume it will be soon. Cheers, DonDon Johnstone-9/26/1999
936 <<SI has value beyond on-demand flame mail>> I'm with you on tDon Johnstone-9/26/1999
935 Steve... I was at the dinner with Don and RCDTD, and I second Don's post. Claude M-9/26/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):