SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Complacency Indexes
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1487 37 0
Emcee:  TechTrader42 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
962I was just about to post them. I was preoccupied by other absorbing matters hereTechTrader42-4/24/2002
961Ahem... CIs please? -g-Paul Shread-4/24/2002
960Yes, I was going to mention that to you, too, funnily enough. Add to that the AJTechTrader42-4/24/2002
959Thank you for that link. I sometimes feel like I am doing the enriching your woOral Roberts-4/24/2002
958Just uncoffle me!MechanicalMethod-4/24/2002
957well, go to m-w.com and install their dictionary button on your browser tool barbob wallace-4/24/2002
956googol.com Noticed the moon lately? MontyMonty Lenard-4/24/2002
955LOL, well most of the time you don't have to worry about that with me becausMonty Lenard-4/24/2002
954Why is it I can't read this thread without a dictionary beside me?MechanicalMethod-4/24/2002
953Yep she is that. She won't even post on her own thread. We need to uncoffMonty Lenard-4/23/2002
952MechanicalMethod: How are ya? The CI's were posted as something of an expeTechTrader42-4/23/2002
951You're too complacent about posting the CI.MechanicalMethod-4/23/2002
950Bull/bear ratio way too optimistic. I think if we start trending down, investorsDarth Trader-4/20/2002
949The Naz ST CI got up into the 80s this morning, Susan. Now it's in the 90s (TechTrader42-4/19/2002
948This morning's readings must have been absurd...nearing 100? What a ramp joSusan G-4/19/2002
947ST Naz CI: 56.258 59.975 MT Naz CI: 56.258 59.975 LT Naz CI: 80.530 82.184 ST STechTrader42-4/17/2002
946Incidentally, the Barnacle strayed into the U.S. territorial waters last week, aTechTrader42-4/16/2002
945The Naz CI gave an end-of-day bottoming-out buy signal on 4/11, hitting 1.45. ThTechTrader42-4/16/2002
944Q: General tax question: Are taxes due on any profits made as a result of followTechTrader42-4/14/2002
943Reversal to the upside for Naz CI's. So far, the Naz CI still hasn't hitTechTrader42-4/10/2002
942Basically, QQQ hit the Feb. low, though the Naz composite hasn't quite hit tTechTrader42-4/10/2002
941Oddly enuf, the divergence was the clue that the schnooks chasing the Naz this mTechTrader42-4/10/2002
940Divergence again: ST Naz CI: 6.601 7.817 MT Naz CI: 16.457 24.426 LT Naz CI: 71TechTrader42-4/10/2002
939ST Naz CI: 12.921 7.817 MT Naz CI: 22.111 24.426 LT Naz CI: 73.762 73.551 ST S&TechTrader42-4/10/2002
938Still divergence in Naz CI and Naz composite. All very odd. ST Naz CI: 5.056 7.TechTrader42-4/10/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News