SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTC
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
990 16 0 INTC
Emcee:  Jules B. Garfunkel Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
965 Jules, first of all, please feel free to send any post of mine to whoever you fYONSU-10/3/1999
964 Bob, It is so good to here from you again. Jack and I often talk of you and theJules B. Garfunkel-10/3/1999
963 Jules, it has been a few (years) much has happened, including my coming to thisYONSU-9/30/1999
962 Richard, I just posted this on the Intel thread. As I stated, I have been buyinJules B. Garfunkel-9/24/1999
961 Richard, Here is a copy of Jack's next post which somewhat clarifies his viJules B. Garfunkel-9/21/1999
960 Richard, As you know, I am not a TA analyst so I am not the best person to ask.Jules B. Garfunkel-9/20/1999
959 A clarification -- "head and shoulders" indicates an upside breakout,Richard Forsythe-9/20/1999
958 All, The following is a series of e-mails between Jack Rains and myself. BecausJules B. Garfunkel-9/20/1999
957 Is INTC undervalued? There are several fundamental analysis scenarios given in stan roberts-5/27/1999
956 Stephen, Harry and All, Intel @52 IBM @118 I have posted Jules B. Garfunkel-5/27/1999
955 David, Thank you so much for your kind words. I still communicate with Jack, buJules B. Garfunkel-5/17/1999
954 Dear Jules, I've been reading your posts since before this thread was starDavid McDonough-5/12/1999
953 OK, not lousy like AMD is lousy, but lousy as in "uninspiring". I donRichard Forsythe-4/22/1999
952 IBM is not a lousy company. If you think IBM is cooking the books, do a cash flFrodo Baxter-4/22/1999
951 Hey, good companies can have lousy quarters and lousy companies can have good qRichard Forsythe-4/21/1999
950 Richard, I just posted this on the IBM thread. Yes I believe the markets will bJules B. Garfunkel-4/21/1999
949 Thoughts on IBM's most recent release? Obviously they bought back another 5Richard Forsythe-4/21/1999
948 Jules, I'm reading too. I may be quiet here, but I appreciate your thoughBarry Grossman-4/21/1999
947 Jules, I keep up also. Traffic is low...content is high. I think of this as Fred Fahmy-4/20/1999
946 Jules, This is one thread upon which I never skip messages. Regards, dmgDavid M Gambs-4/20/1999
945 Jules. Here is a very important article from Forbes that the thread should see.Harry Landsiedel-4/20/1999
944 Always enjoy your threads,Jules...looks like investors were premature in investpuborectalis-4/20/1999
943 Just out of curiosity, are there any other readers of this thread out there, otJules B. Garfunkel-4/20/1999
942 Harry, My, <"But then again, give me a week to recover from Friday'Jules B. Garfunkel-4/19/1999
941 Harry, I agree with you completely, and I concur that this hedge strategy is abJules B. Garfunkel-4/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News