SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic
An SI Board Since June 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1141 14 0
Emcee:  jjayxxxx Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
966I did a test to see how many posts would be generated by an inane comment. TherFJB-4/12/2007
965jay You should not assume what my motive is. I agree that banning people can brupert1-4/12/2007
964Ali Chen Very well put. The speed limit would probably prevent me making therupert1-4/12/2007
963Robert G Speed Limit In my opinion, the speed limit came about because a very rupert1-4/12/2007
962What about the rules already in place, like no personal insults and the speed liFJB-4/12/2007
961Well, I would be a "no moderation" moderator, other than the SI TOU. dougSF30-4/12/2007
960doug, I would also nominate you to be monitor. Over the last couple of years, yThe Duke of URL©-4/12/2007
959Ali, why don't you become moderator? Rink, I nominate Ali. Ali...Ali...AliThe Duke of URL©-4/12/2007
958JJ, rupert just wants himself and his buddy mas to control the other board. He&#dougSF30-4/12/2007
957<i>So far the ban list has all right people except mas_ and pirasa2 (I candougSF30-4/12/2007
956"...call for a non-activist moderator who relied on the experience and selfAli Chen-4/12/2007
955Rink I have just tried to send you another PM and got the same error message torupert1-4/12/2007
954What is wrong with banning people who make trouble? Has nothing to do with likejjayxxxx-4/12/2007
953Rupert, I don't agree with paragraphs 2-4 but that might actually not be thaRink-4/12/2007
952<i>Things are not perfect over there now, but it is actually going fairly rupert1-4/12/2007
951I am not seeking support. I put my name forward because I was asked. I'm srupert1-4/12/2007
950Rupert, JJ, "I also added some bans and issued a couple of suspensions.&quoRink-4/12/2007
949Robert, I'm pretty sure Rupert was talking about lifting the bans for EphudRink-4/12/2007
948Rupert, I'm going to wait for 7 days (till April 19th) for other candidateRink-4/12/2007
947I don't think you could get much support for being moderator by bringing bacFJB-4/12/2007
946For the record, I have not banned anyone on this thread, nor do I have that capajjayxxxx-4/12/2007
945That person posts on the AMD v Intel thread so obviously is not subjected to a brupert1-4/11/2007
944 SI admins can ban people on any thread including unmoderated threads.TimF-4/11/2007
943I see one ban on this thread. Did he ban himself?rupert1-4/11/2007
942<I> You seem to ban the same people Rink does. </i> Does he haveTimF-4/11/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):