SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Compaq
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
97611 138 0 CPQ
Emcee:  Stan Standridge Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
96611"Wouldn't surprise me to see CPQ come ALL-THE-WAY BACK by day's-endCaptain Jack-3/28/2002
96610Consider that HewPaq is a turning point deal. After this merger, if it works, WMeDroogies-3/28/2002
96609ROFLMAO!! WW basically admits loss as he scrambles to be committed! Now cpq drCaptain Jack-3/28/2002
96608Dear KAD: Check you PMs. I sent you one yesterday. If you didn't get it, letLynn-3/28/2002
96607<Does the CEO have the right to delay closing the polls? > Not unless auThe Duke of URL©-3/28/2002
96606<WS doesn't want this merger> Not sure you're correct ... WS wantPCSS-3/28/2002
96605WS doesn't want this merger.Night Writer-3/28/2002
96604<I>A corporation who feels favorably disposed to deal with certain sharehoNight Writer-3/28/2002
96603All things considered .... with HWP UP .12 now -- it only means that CPQ is wortPCSS-3/28/2002
96602<i>Wouldn't surprise me to see CPQ come ALL-THE-WAY BACK by day's-Elwood P. Dowd-3/28/2002
96601Business PC language? Never used it in my life. I'm not sure your evaluatMeDroogies-3/28/2002
96600<b>HP Comments on Complaint Filed by Walter Hewlett HP Believes Suit is CPCSS-3/28/2002
96599<Not a good indication for the merger> Those believing that the suit vs tPCSS-3/28/2002
96598Spread now over $1.00 again. Not a good indication for the merger. ElElwood P. Dowd-3/28/2002
96597Let's get down in the dirt and use plain English to discuss what happened. Night Writer-3/28/2002
96596I agree with you on the moral and ethics issues, but I don't see a gap that MeDroogies-3/28/2002
96595John, HWP management continues to deny the obvious merger distraction. Honesty Night Writer-3/28/2002
96594Here's an interesting article on Jack Welch: BusinessWeek Online Where'Elwood P. Dowd-3/28/2002
96593I sense the same generation gap here that I sensed at work. The trendy quote waNight Writer-3/28/2002
96592NW: My only point was that sometimes one has to fight fire with fire. If WW hadElwood P. Dowd-3/28/2002
96591No, Enron is a case of lying. Normally failure to disclose may not be a lie, buThe Duke of URL©-3/28/2002
96590Today's WSJ 'Heard on the Street' column... Best regards, John HJohn Koligman-3/28/2002
96589<I>And I don't think that the attempt to preserve mutually beneficial Night Writer-3/28/2002
96588El, I have never defended WW, and I not about to start doing it now. I didn'Night Writer-3/28/2002
96587I don't think it shows low moral or ethical values. It is certainly not a MeDroogies-3/28/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News