SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Asia Forum
An SI Board Since December 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
9980 53 0
Emcee:  Thomas Haegin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9755Did you know that the container port/cruise ship facility that Hutchison-WhampoaDayuhan-9/4/2000
9754Personally, I think it's a bunch of <i>Bircher style</i> nonsensshadowman-9/4/2000
9753Help please! I`m trying to locate a story about the Chinese gov`t running the PJHP-9/4/2000
9752I think you're right. Wen Ho Lee is being set up as a patsy.Tom Clarke-8/30/2000
9751I had intended to say "probably includes", rather than "includes&Tom Clarke-8/30/2000
9750Its not just another attack on Reno and Richardson. Scheer is an editor at the NTom Clarke-8/30/2000
9749That's what I love about global politics... Trying to figure out the globHawkmoon-8/30/2000
9748Certainly not something to be taken at face value, but equally certainly an astoDayuhan-8/30/2000
9747<i>I wonder how seriously this should be taken...</i> About as seriHawkmoon-8/29/2000
9746I wonder how seriously this should be taken... iht.comDayuhan-8/29/2000
9745I find it entirely believable that there are large numbers of Chinese workers inDayuhan-8/29/2000
9744I've got a theory. When the Lee case came up, the Administration was takingJim S-8/29/2000
9743Somehow all of these articles seem to end with attacks on Janet Reno and/or BillSam-8/29/2000
9742Put the government on trial, not Wen Ho Lee. Wrong One Is on Trial in Lee Case Tom Clarke-8/29/2000
9741The 700,000 number includes various ancillary personnel. <i>An internal Tom Clarke-8/29/2000
9740<i>Go on about your business citizens.</i> By your command, comradeHawkmoon-8/29/2000
9739Probably shouldn't have brought it up. If it turns out bogus - sorry. Go oDMaA-8/29/2000
9738I don't know about the London Daily Telegraph, but I certainly don't thiDayuhan-8/29/2000
9737Here is a link that talks about the London Sunday Telegraph story. Sorry, donDMaA-8/28/2000
9736The link you cited mentions "tens of thousands", where did the 700,000Dayuhan-8/28/2000
9735<i>Now, maybe up to 700,000 troops in Sudan:</i> Yeah.. saw that onHawkmoon-8/28/2000
9734Now, maybe up to 700,000 troops in Sudan: vny.comDMaA-8/28/2000
9733Another clear difference between Western and Asian values (as represented by theHawkmoon-8/24/2000
9732I agree with you, it shouldn't. I interpret the article as being critical oCIMA-8/22/2000
9731Why should Chinese arms sales be any more likely to create an arms race than theDayuhan-8/22/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News