SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
ORXX - Orex Gold Mines Corporation
An SI Board Since May 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2392 11 0 ORXX
Emcee:  GOLDLOADED Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
992 GaBards comments aren't really directed to you. They seem to be directed toTideGlider-8/28/1999
991 I agree and the terms should have been disclosed. I have been told 5 - 8 MilliGa Bard-8/28/1999
990 Now that is the Tim Hall I use to know... Great post Tim ... I hope you can geGa Bard-8/27/1999
989 Gary, I will reserve my judgement of Chuca's attempt to pedal his claims aTim Hall-8/27/1999
988 Zeev, I agree, lots of sour grapes. In Orex's favor though, we are dealing Laser-8/27/1999
987 Tim, fellow long (at least on paper), ignore this Zeev guy. He is obviously parJeffrey S. Mitchell-8/27/1999
986 Zeev, I respect your opinion and you forthright integrity. I also understand tGa Bard-8/27/1999
985 The Haber processes may be 15 years old to you, but they are brand new to Ga BaJeffrey S. Mitchell-8/27/1999
984 Laser, we have seen the same from IPMCF, to MXAM, to NAXOF, to GPGI and probablZeev Hed-8/27/1999
983 Zeev, Haber admits to the required "tweaking" to perfect the economicLaser-8/27/1999
982 Gary, "" Oh and the reserves might be 600,000 tons with an grade of Tim Hall-8/27/1999
981 GB, as I have explained before, my reason for posting was another "occurreZeev Hed-8/27/1999
980 Robert, if the silica is the left over from the Haber gold process, it will surZeev Hed-8/27/1999
979 Hey if I may not be here ... I may have a real job ... hehehehe but duellin witGa Bard-8/27/1999
978 Oh yeah right ... DMEC came to me as has four others since then which I did notGa Bard-8/27/1999
977 GB, you're a real hoot mon! You're polarizing the thread too much withLaser-8/27/1999
976 OH and you are so incompetent you over looked Chuck is paid by NUKE and he trieTim Hall-8/27/1999
975 Now Tim ... you are out to help no one but this one is personal to you. and itGa Bard-8/27/1999
974 Hey Robert you remember the last time we believe the nays ... TNRG ... I walkedGa Bard-8/27/1999
973 Gary, I am just trying to help you. You posted the section numbers of the minTim Hall-8/27/1999
972 hehehe someone is being convenient again aren't they. <shaking head lauGa Bard-8/27/1999
971 Thanks Due ... that is what I thought ... the trading and the codes speak for tGa Bard-8/27/1999
970 hehehehe good luck Tim ... Might want to go read Gene's report again. LOGa Bard-8/27/1999
969 Oh I see ... if you post good, positive or facts then it is HYPE and you are suGa Bard-8/27/1999
968 hmmm well they quoted from the FMC report and the fuel energy report. Silica iGa Bard-8/27/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):