NIFTY NINE IN NINETY NINE PLUS ONE | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
NIFTY NINE IN NINETY NINE PLUS ONE

An SI Board Since December 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
613	3	0

Emcee: Arthur Radley	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
613	I don't think you will get your TTP at 15.50. I must admit that I sold at 1	Arthur Radley	-	1/16/2000
612	I'm about 1/3rd cash & watching closely. I actually have a couple good	Scott H. Davis	-	1/15/2000
611	If you have some biotechs chosen for the year ahead, feel free to mark them do	Mike McFarland	-	1/14/2000
610	<<is there an ADR? >> No unfortunately. Spreads are abysmal. Can	michael_f_murphy	-	1/14/2000
609	CAT quote nasdaq.co.uk CAT thread Subject 32516 Catcall cboe, etc Missed tha	Mike McFarland	-	1/14/2000
608	I suggest you contact Dan Burton and George Bush, who wants to be the next Pres	Arthur Radley	-	1/8/2000
607	Don't know why this was posted here, I agree son belongs with father, but i	Scott H. Davis	-	1/8/2000
606	Why is the United States holding a little Cuban boy hostage? Have we gone nuts?	Lucrative	-	1/8/2000
605	Harold, I promise to give a final update sooooon...this is the busy season for	Arthur Radley	-	1/5/2000
604	Thanks for the reply, Scott. I probably did comment to the effect that "so	Harold V	-	1/5/2000
603	Harold, If my memory was correct, you early expresseed that some of us were tak	Scott H. Davis	-	1/4/2000
602	Congrats, Dude--great stock picking! And to Dude, Greg, Mike, and all, I was u	Harold V	-	1/3/2000
601	Sounds good to me--Kidney association-- then I wont have to feel bad if somebo	Mike McFarland	-	1/1/2000
600	Well, you guys killed me. My total return on the original 10 for the year was	Brander	-	1/1/2000
599	Good idea for the thread....go for it! You might lower the amount as it might i	Arthur Radley	-	1/1/2000
598	Thanks Dude, it was a squeaker and that 220% could be ten percent high, I didn	Mike McFarland	-	1/1/2000
597	Okay Fellows! Here are my final stats for 1999. Of the 10, only one loser(Xoma.	Arthur Radley	-	1/1/2000
596	Dude, Great going! While I had a good first half, the second six months were o	Abuckatatime	-	1/1/2000
595	I have a red-faced disclosure. Ya'll have probably seen a boatload of my t	Scott H. Davis	-	1/1/2000
594	The Quack Attack is BACK! >Those Duck uniforms are uglier than O.J Sim	Brander	-	12/31/1999
593	Okay! You got LUCKY again....but you have to admit one thing. Those Duck unifor	Arthur Radley	-	12/31/1999
592	Well, looks like this is going to be hard earned Tequila. 7/7 half. :-)	Brander	-	12/31/1999
591	I'm a little worried that trading may have impaired my performance, and tha	Mike McFarland	-	12/31/1999
590	Scott, I was well above 100%, but NXTL and GLGC have pulled back as of late giv	Arthur Radley	-	12/31/1999
589	Dude & all: Checked out my returns on the profile since June and was plesa	Scott H. Davis	-	12/30/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):