SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Hearx(EAR)
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
383 3 0 EAR
Emcee:  James A. Albers Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
383 What makes you say that; after the reverse split we've been around 5 foreveSG-2/24/2000
382 Hi, I've been holding for a few years. Looks like finally we are starting Simprofié-2/24/2000
381 Some of us still here also.Long time is true. Let's see if this is the begiSG-1/24/2000
380 Helloooooo! The echo in here is deafening, but the stock is certainly coming alLee Bush-1/24/2000
379 Hellloooo out there. My, what great interest in this stock! Lee Lee Bush-7/22/1999
378 News out today: I'm somewhat disappointed. I had hoped that we would be clLee Bush-7/21/1999
377 Lee, you are right. The baggage is still there. We have room to move to $18. Zantac-7/13/1999
376 Zantac: I have been out of this stock for several years, but I have bought a lLee Bush-7/9/1999
375 Latest news from Hear-X. It took them a couple of days to post this release onZantac-7/8/1999
374 Now that the reverse split is accomplished, this stock may have a future! ThisLee Bush-7/8/1999
373 well said! Piratess-5/11/1999
372 Just got my proxy letter; hell will freeze over before i vote to reverse splitSG-5/11/1999
371 the idea is probably to get the price over $5 so brokers and institutions not aBen Marfield-4/28/1999
370 Not me. SGSG-4/25/1999
369 In my opinion, the reverse stock split is needed but not at this time. If theyCONANN-4/25/1999
368 It sounds like a disaster to me, too, as a long time shareholder. I thought thSG-4/23/1999
367 I don't see the intent to issue more shares. The reverse split is bad enouBen Marfield-4/22/1999
366 Be sure and read about the 10:1 reverse split. Hearx wants you to vote yes so tTom Shutters-4/22/1999
365 Company does not release any good information, and the stock just sits there lfrancis terry-4/22/1999
364 Have held EAR for what seems like a loooong time. . .and did just about forget ckern-4/22/1999
363 Yes you are right, this one can do a lot better and we are in a very good posifrancis terry-4/12/1999
362 T F I'm here too! I think EAR has great potential, but we seem to be amonWineOh-4/11/1999
361 Thanks for the responses.----francis terry francis terry-4/9/1999
360 I know the Yahoo thread gets old fast. No news on my end, just try and reSimprofié-4/9/1999
359 Thought there for a moment I was all alone, but i see that there is some one efrancis terry-4/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News