SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Low Unemployment? Really?
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
18 1 0
Emcee:  BWAC Type:  Unmoderated
I heard some numbers on the local news that sorta amazed me so I did a little more digging. My conclusion is that the "low unemployment" is in the large cities, not in the outlying areas of the economic region.

Take Metro Charlotte, NC for example:
(Source: NC Employment Security Commission Website)
ncesc.com

NC Economic Development Regions and their counties

Carolinas Partnership EDR - Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Catawba, Cleveland, Gaston, Iredell, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Rowan, Stanly, Union

Individual Rates:
Mecklenburg (Charlotte) 2.5%
Rowan 9.5% (Freightliner Plant layoffs)
Stanly 4.4%
Union 2.3% (A lot of Commuters to Charlotte)
Lincoln 5.2%
Iredell 5.2%
Gaston 8.1% (Mill layoffs)
Cleveland 6.7%
Catawba 2.4% (Furniture Industry Booming, for Now!)
Cabarrus 3.0% (A lot of Commuters to Charlotte)
Anson 6.6%
Alexander 3.4%

The state quotes the region to be at 4%, which is skewed by the population center of Mecklenburg. Taking each county as equal weight the average comes out to be 5%. Maybe Greenspan needs to get out of the cities every once in a while and look around?

Anybody see similar situations in your part of the country? I always find it amazing that the government works so actively to keep a certain portion of the population jobless and pennyless.

Interest rates are too high.
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18BWAC, you are correct that "it depends" when it comes to unemployment.Mike 2.0-11/27/2000
17But if I pay myself then I automatically lose 12% of my money. Let's face igulleyjimson-11/26/2000
16the tax is okay, you are doing some good for the nation !!!Bald Man from Mars-11/26/2000
15I would but I don't want to pay 12 percent Social Security tax.gulleyjimson-11/26/2000
14BWAC, All bs aside, here in south central Pa. there are jobs aplenty. Some commuSteve Felix-11/26/2000
13dude, what is the story with you ... so why don't you employ yourself, good Bald Man from Mars-11/26/2000
12I've been unemployed and unemployable for 20 years. Obviously another exampgulleyjimson-11/26/2000
11<<It is a feel good number. But what is actually beneath the number? >&Bald Man from Mars-11/26/2000
10Hey from your education, you should easily be able to see that the 3.9% headlineBWAC-11/26/2000
9<couldn't you get some small business loan or something ...> Lets jusBWAC-11/26/2000
8couldn't you get some small business loan or something ... may be you can uBald Man from Mars-11/26/2000
7I would hire you, I would train you, I would pay a decent salary, with decent beBWAC-11/26/2000
6dude, if you are hiring, this is my educational background B.S. in Mathematics fBald Man from Mars-11/26/2000
5dude, are you going to hire me or not, you can train me, right ... I have a deceBald Man from Mars-11/26/2000
4Well thank you, Bald and Steve, for your, err, discussion? Is the current econoBWAC-11/26/2000
3Sir, can I meet your wife, I love her sense of humor ...Bald Man from Mars-11/26/2000
2Bald Man, I would hire you to figure my compound interest, but with interest ratSteve Felix-11/25/2000
1dude, I need a job, can you hire me, the problem is I don't know anything ..Bald Man from Mars-11/25/2000
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):