Short Selling, Banned members, Justice for All

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
Short Selling, Banned members, Justice for All

An SI Board Since June 2006

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
50	8	0

Emcee: a-hole	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

All to often the moderators, when confronted with the truth, shy away, or ban other members for posting items which they feel are deliterious to their well being. Tough. My attitude, is let it rip. Lets bring out all the "Truth" about all these "legends in their own minds". We know who they are. Lets expose them for what they really are.

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
50	4197 (Berke) 11 Again, not suggesting any impropriety on the 12 government's	ravenseye	-	6/29/2006
49	That particular 'witness' did not learn he was considered an unindicted	peter michaelson	-	6/29/2006
48	According to Berke, the unindicted coconspirator knew before trial. Is that wron	ravenseye	-	6/29/2006
47	Are you aware of who that 'witness' is? He woke up that morning to read	peter michaelson	-	6/29/2006
46	As to the record .... 5111 1 (Sidebar.) 2 THE COURT:	ravenseye	-	6/29/2006
45	Why are you asking me? I already asked you " How many people did the govern	ravenseye	-	6/29/2006
44	THATS GREAT. THEY NEVER TOLD ME I WAS A UNINDICTED CO-CONSPIRATOR. THANKS SO M	StockDung	-	6/29/2006
43	THEY SHOULD HAVE ISSUED THEIR RELEASE ON THENOBUSINESSWIRE WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN	StockDung	-	6/29/2006
42	I DO NOT THINK I WAS ON THE LIST OF CO-CONSPIRATORS. WHO WAS ON THE LIST?	StockDung	-	6/29/2006
41	BTW - this is a great idea for a board. I'd love to see some real discussio	rrufff	-	6/29/2006
40	I thought it was fantastic on many levels. The details and the background are s	rrufff	-	6/29/2006
39	You make an excellent point. I have no problem with contrary or negative opinio	rrufff	-	6/29/2006
38	It's an act to intimidate with nonsense on his part in my opinion. lma(zz)o	ravenseye	-	6/29/2006
37	jefFREYs homeowners policy Safeco Insurance, paid Business Wire $27,500. Messag	ravenseye	-	6/29/2006
36	Ruff, what did you think of the testimony given today in the Senate Hearing? I t	a-hole	-	6/29/2006
35	This is one of the issues I take exception to with the Legend. Like Paul Harvey	a-hole	-	6/29/2006
34	Yes she did, if I remember correctly I think she tried to enlist the help of the	a-hole	-	6/29/2006
33	Subject 24917 ie Business Wire / Webnode Lawsuit	ravenseye	-	6/29/2006
32	Janice??	rrufff	-	6/29/2006
31	4197 2 THE COURT: So they don't need counsel? 3 MR. BERKE: Judge, my onl	ravenseye	-	6/29/2006
30	Janice had one of those, a legal defense fund.	ravenseye	-	6/29/2006
29	You know your logs!	a-hole	-	6/29/2006
28	Was that "bail out" under the premise of the truthseeker legal defense	ravenseye	-	6/29/2006
27	Who did the stunning research for that site? Does anyone know? How many of us ha	a-hole	-	6/29/2006
26	I disagree with you based on the governments opening statement. Seems to me the	ravenseye	-	6/28/2006

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):