Future growth stocks of 1997 | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Future growth stocks of 1997

An SI Board Since December 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
391	9	0

Emcee: Dan Ross	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Growth stocks of 1997

This forum is being established to find the stars of 1997. Listed below are the criteria for a stock to be mentioned in the forum. Please follow the requirements below to ensure that all SI members can get a grasp of the stock.

Requirements

1.) Give the story of the stock.
ú You cannot simply state the symbol.
ú State why you feel the company is poised for growth. Convince us!
2.) Revenues growing at least 75% annually.
3.) No more than 25 million shares outstanding.
4.) Stock must be at least $1.50
5.) No gold stocks or oil stocks - THIS ISN'T A GAMBLING FORUM!!!!
6.) No stocks with P/E's > 100. "They have already been discovered!"

Some may ask, "Why these requirements?"

The reason for these requirements are as follows:
1. Small companies grow faster than large companies.
2. Huge returns are possible due to small floats
ú A stock can split over and over and still only have 25-30 million shares outstanding.

I would like for this forum to be a discussion area. If anyone knows a growth stock with the above criteria like the back of their hand, let the members know the trading range and pattern of the stock.

As time progresses, I may add or delete some requirements. If anyone has any requirements, please let me know.

Good Luck to all

Dan Ross

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
391	testing	Siva Uppalapati	-	2/11/2000
390	Scott, you've posted this on last year's thread. Please go to the 1998	White Shoes	-	1/11/1998
389	You may have heard of it already but here goes. Video Display.. VIDE.. micro ca	Scott Bankston	-	1/11/1998
388	To all, here are the results of the 1997 portfolio. I did the calculations us	White Shoes	-	1/10/1998
387	Reminiscing...PMTI was at $7 when the said poster was trash talking, now at $1.	White Shoes	-	12/16/1997
386	WS, See you over there. NEOG is still my favorite for 1998, up 12% today on an	Rich Genik	-	12/16/1997
385	Hi Paul, lucky for me I stepped out of CPCI at $17...but in any case the idea w	White Shoes	-	12/16/1997
384	Wow, totally forgot about this thread! I had picked PPD, PWAV and CPCI last yea	Paul Schmidt	-	12/16/1997
383	Two others we were following were MRVC & CPCI...MRVC no great shakes, same	White Shoes	-	12/15/1997
382	I have unfortunately treated the thread like a stepchild.......I haven't ev	Dan Ross	-	12/15/1997
381	So Dan, How'd we do overall? There were two that I followed this year whic	Rich Genik	-	12/15/1997
380	Sorry...error...ignore...	Blue	-	12/12/1997
379	This one should be breaking out soon; check it out. Environmental Safeguards,	James A. Albers	-	3/10/1997
378	jgp I was not aware of that; although, from the language of the form, it seeme	Rich Genik	-	2/26/1997
377	Rich Noticed your note about Marsh Mac selling shares to Putnam ... I wasn'	jgp	-	2/26/1997
376	There are many companies addressing digital video. Any one could be a surprise	hillary kapan	-	2/23/1997
375	Is there any companies which develop Digital TV/satellite systems?	s jones	-	2/22/1997
374	Geek, Yes, the Commodore 64 and the Amiga and others had video circuitry to	hillary kapan	-	2/20/1997
373	I used to have a Commodore 64 which worked on my TV, is it sort of like that?	White Shoes	-	2/20/1997
372	Well I wish you luck. If you latch onto a 70 bagger I don't suppose it wil	White Shoes	-	2/19/1997
371	----------------------------------------------------- For those who want more i	hillary kapan	-	2/19/1997
370	Geek, Good idea, here's to boiling it down... I don't have all the inf	hillary kapan	-	2/19/1997
369	Hillary, thanks for your comments...can you BOIL it down for me so I don't	White Shoes	-	2/19/1997
368	Geek, Thanks for your well considered posts, some of the best. I just found	hillary kapan	-	2/19/1997
367	IMO...netspeak for In My Opinion. Overused but sometimes I feel like using it	White Shoes	-	2/17/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):