SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ASND - Discussion, but no quotes
An SI Board Since September 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
186 0 0 ASND
Emcee:  Carl R. Type:  Unmoderated
I thought that the main ASND thread was becoming more than a bit crowded at over 200 posts per day, so I decided to create a new thread that could include some discussion, but without the day-trading, quotes, etc. I would anticipate that both fundamentals, technicals, etc would be welcome, but hopefully some of the time dependent stuff could stay elsewhere.

Good luck to all,

Carl
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
186 Will, He also broke The Code of Ethics. See this: exchange2000.com GlennGlenn D. Rudolph-10/4/1997
185 Carl, We sure agree on this one. GlennGlenn D. Rudolph-10/2/1997
184 <i>I am too scared to actually pull it off, because BAY's chart is a Glenn D. Rudolph-10/2/1997
183 I am too scared to actually pull it off, because BAY's chart is a thing of Thomas M.-10/2/1997
182 No fair. You peeked. <G> I don't actually hold any shares right nowCarl R.-10/2/1997
181 Dear Carl, Rip Van Winkle is having a nightmare. Blessings, BillPastor William E. Schmidt-10/2/1997
180 I agree, shorting BAY right now would not be a good idea. It is still outperfoCarl R.-10/2/1997
179 <i>What do you think of a paired trade of long ASND/ short BAY?</i>Glenn D. Rudolph-10/1/1997
178 Glenn, Regarding BAY, they are taking on ASND on the WAN and CSCO on the LAN. Thomas M.-9/29/1997
177 <i>glenn, I've moved to the ascend traders thread,,, this david guy hGlenn D. Rudolph-9/28/1997
176 steve: thanks for your reply ! d. david-9/28/1997
175 glenn, I've moved to the ascend traders thread,,, this david guy has prettyhpeace-9/28/1997
174 <i>So in summary lets agree to sometimes disagree, for rstrained disagreGlenn D. Rudolph-9/28/1997
173 Gary, Are you trying to say that you're tire of the Paul Johnson discussioStu Bishop-9/28/1997
172 Glen, brokerage houses financial analysis is supplied in many forms. The analThomas George Warner-9/28/1997
171 <i>Bud is great! I can even read the age-dating code on Bud bottles (1 lGlenn D. Rudolph-9/27/1997
170 <i>I chart in another window from WSJ interactive. SI is faster.</i>Gary Korn-9/27/1997
169 <i>Are you pulling my leg? The "Charts" button.</i> I reGlenn D. Rudolph-9/27/1997
168 <i>The left hand corner of where?</i> Glenn, Are you pulling my lGary Korn-9/27/1997
167 <i>Glenn, of late, it seems to be the former. Soon (not until after earnGlenn D. Rudolph-9/27/1997
166 <i>By the way, is that 10 brews for each point or ten points for each breGary Korn-9/27/1997
165 <i>Pretty amazing stuff, huh? Now, what happens when physicians screw up?Glenn D. Rudolph-9/27/1997
164 Glenn, Pretty amazing stuff, huh? Now, what happens when physicians screw up?Gary Korn-9/27/1997
163 Gary, Since most of the laywer jokes are "nasty", I thought I would Glenn D. Rudolph-9/27/1997
162rmi.net Glenn, it's a different guy. You might try to do a search for JohnGary Korn-9/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):