ASND - longterm investors with short term worries

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
ASND - longterm investors with short term worries

An SI Board Since October 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
67	0	0	ASND

Emcee: minhaj hasan	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

ASND COMMUNICATION
The reason to start this thread is simple. On main ASND thread ther are a lot of people posting stuff that is misleading and damaging to long term investors. SHORTS and DAY TRADERS STAY AWAY.

The purpose of this thread is to encourage and reassure long term investors about there investment in ASND. Although, if something comes up, which is negative about this stock (with proof and not hype) than it will be moral responsibility to share with people on this thread.

Rules of this thread are :
1) Discussion limited to ASND only
2) Don't post any news items, if it doesn't directly affect ASND's daily stock price in a big way.
3) Don't discuss issues with day trading
4) Don't come here for counseling and taking frustration out on us
5) No name calling. Be civilized and friendly
6) Be sincere and honest in your opinions. Remember you may give us wrong advice but GOD IS WATCHING
7) ENJOY AND HAPPY INVESTING

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
67	<All of the negative sentiment on this and other ASND threads leads me to be	LLCF	-	11/10/1997
66	John: I agree with you.	Doug Skrypek	-	11/10/1997
65	<In the current climate and ascend's current blunders I could see the &l	westes	-	11/10/1997
64	The sentiment on the ASND thread is really not negative compared with some othe	John Ritter	-	11/9/1997
63	All of the negative sentiment on this and other ASND threads leads me to believ	Doug Skrypek	-	11/9/1997
62	Sounds like wishful thinking.	Hector	-	11/8/1997
61	Oh crystal ball (P.M. Freedman), thank you for looking into the future sharing	JTM	-	11/7/1997
60	Why are you telling this ?	Bernard Gauthier	-	11/7/1997
59	Next Monday and Tuesday will be ASND's days. Its volumes will return above	P.M.Freedman	-	11/7/1997
58	You have a point, based on TA the way to have made money would have been shorti	John Ritter	-	11/7/1997
57	I was just wondering if you guys have any TA oriented contributors here. I'	Doug R	-	11/7/1997
56	To recover money lost one would need to turn to a higher risk growth stock, ASN	John Ritter	-	11/6/1997
55	You already understand that your actions aren't going to send ASND up or do	Dad of The Rock	-	11/6/1997
54	I found the article and it was from the San Francisco Chronicle business sectio	William Grady	-	11/6/1997
53	ASND is a value playing. Let's compare with CSCO. Assume that you had one	P.M.Freedman	-	11/6/1997
52	Is the bad news for the next couple of quarters already into the share price of	Evan Dimmer	-	11/6/1997
51	Minhaj, I'll give you some good reasons to hold ASND: The have 500 millio	John Lacelle	-	11/6/1997
50	ASCEND COMMUNICATIONS (From Briefing) Network access concern gave a near-term s	jad	-	11/6/1997
49	There is a good possibility that why ASND will make its number this quarter and	Jinfu Chen	-	11/6/1997
48	>San Francisco Chronicle ran an article on the front page of their business	Jinfu Chen	-	11/5/1997
47	cymi split though, it did not sink from 90 to 22, 45 to 22 (still a big loss).	ALDEN HUEN	-	11/5/1997
46	Barry - IMHO, we the shr holders can ill-afford ASND mgt to take its sweet time	Bosco	-	11/5/1997
45	If it takes them a few quarters to get things "on the right track," I	yard_man	-	11/5/1997
44	most curious that you think that the 'greater fool' theory only applies	raymond marcotte	-	11/5/1997
43	I think the stock is worth 25, and may well head higher, but as was mentioned l	John Ritter	-	11/4/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):