RMIL LURKERS | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
RMIL LURKERS

An SI Board Since January 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
54	4	0

Emcee: Frank Summers	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

I AM AN RMIL LURKER.

I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW MANY OTHERS ARE. THIS COULD BE OUR PLACE TO DISCUSS THIS STOCK WITHOUT PRESSURE. NO ONE NEEDS TO BE A CARTEL MEMBER, NO ONE NEEDS TO HAVE CALLED FOR CERTS, NO ONE HAS TO ANSWER YEAS OR NAYS, NO ONE HAS TO DO, OR RESPOND TO, QUESTIONS ABOUT DD.

LETS JUST SEE HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE INTERESTED IN THIS STOCK. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW MANY ARE INTERESTED BECAUSE THEY ARE SHAREHOLDERS, OR THINKING ABOUT BECOMING SHAREHOLDERS. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO KNOW HOW MANY THINK THEY ARE DOING A PUBLIC SERVICE BY DISCOURAGING THE BUYING OF THIS STOCK.

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
54	Was this a Mark Schultz special? If so go here to vent. Many other peop	Augustus Gloop	-	6/16/1998
53	Thanks and good luck.	Dale Baker	-	1/26/1998
52	Dale, At this point , RMIL has chosen not to comply with the 15c2-11 until	Pugs	-	1/26/1998
51	Can anyone tell an innocent lurker in a few simple sentences why RMIL still isn	Dale Baker	-	1/26/1998
50	Pugs: Why do you say the SEC turns the other cheek to naked shorting? Can you b	TideGlider	-	1/25/1998
49	>>>>> Maybe they didn't find any<LOL>..DD<<<&	Pugs	-	1/25/1998
48	Pugs,<The halt was lifted after the 10 days expired. Does the SEC care about	Ditchdigger	-	1/25/1998
47	DD, The halt was lifted after the 10 days expired. Does the SEC care about na	Pugs	-	1/24/1998
46	DD: Or anyone...can you enlighten me to the conflict in terms in the LID 8-	TideGlider	-	1/24/1998
45	Pugs, it is unfortunate that, you can't prove a illegal naked short positio	Ditchdigger	-	1/24/1998
44	Frank, I'm a lurker. This is my first post on RMIL. In fact, there are ot	Tom R. Jones	-	1/23/1998
43	>>>>>>Actually we can set ourselves up for a squeeze if the o	Pugs	-	1/23/1998
42	I'm a "hypster"?!! <lol> ...seems you're officially a g	Pugs	-	1/23/1998
41	Agreed. It's just too bad that Riley sends out emails like his "SUSPE	Mesaba	-	1/23/1998
40	One should invest the way one sees fit, saying that....you can search all of Ca	Pugs	-	1/23/1998
39	Pugs Are you a RMIL lurker or hypster?Which title fits? No need to waste your	Lucky	-	1/23/1998
38	For a guy who didn't 'fall' for the short squeeze "tale".	Pugs	-	1/23/1998
37	Angel I had an financial interest in the stock back when it was 75 cents when	Lucky	-	1/23/1998
36	RBM, Now, this is what I call a real "lurker's" thread. Everybo	Angel D	-	1/23/1998
35	Meseba, Obiously you are correct, I don't know many of us who tied up thei	RBM	-	1/21/1998
34	I think he's right in his league calling this a game. Playing with BB stoc	Mesaba	-	1/21/1998
33	Hey Bob, It is amazing in the high stakes game of the OTC BB and a reported 6	RBM	-	1/21/1998
32	<i>Name one firm that that allows any type of shorting of RMIL stock.<	(Bob) Zumbrunnen	-	1/21/1998
31	How many times do I have to tell you? Of the 6 firms in Toronto that I and my	Lucky	-	1/21/1998
30	<i>Until someone can give me a name that I can verify we should all presu	(Bob) Zumbrunnen	-	1/21/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):