Net privacy, that is the question. | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Net privacy, that is the question.

An SI Board Since July 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
43	2	0

Emcee: Josef Svejk	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Court decision gives beleaguered company access to names and addresses of people who have made negative comments about the firm in Internet chat group.

Message 5156403

What's your opinion?

Cheers,

Svejk
abitare.it

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
43	The only secure privacy platform that I am aware of that truly works is provided	hoyasaxa	-	2/16/2001
42	What about a government - our government! Feds' Hands Caught in Cookie Jar	long-gone	-	6/30/2000
41	those scum Wednesday June 21 5:59 PM ET White House Admits Web Privacy Breach	long-gone	-	6/22/2000
40	Jeff, There is something else to remember when talking about a company as oppo	EL KABONG!!!	-	8/1/1998
39	Wow, that's certainly a thought provoking question... I'd love to know	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	8/1/1998
38	Humbly report, Cheryl, the global thing is not abstract to me, personally. My	Josef Svejk	-	8/1/1998
37	Josef, My question was ... how would you feel about this if it <b>person	C.K. Houston	-	8/1/1998
36	Humbly report, Cheryl, taking your theoretical question a step further, let	Josef Svejk	-	8/1/1998
35	<b>THEORETICAL QUESTION</b> If our <i>REAL</i> names (	C.K. Houston	-	8/1/1998
34	<i>" Also present are response's to his messages pointing out wh	Dan Good	-	7/15/1998
33	246810 - Valuespec's messages on SI are there for reading on the FTEL board	Bradley Evans	-	7/14/1998
32	Cookie busters... I'm pretty happy with Cookie Pal, from kburra.com It ha	Dick Smith	-	7/13/1998
31	Here is a good article about chat forum privacy (or lack there of): exchange20	Kent C.	-	7/13/1998
30	AJ, If you go to: download.com you'll find a very small number of progra	EL KABONG!!!	-	7/13/1998
29	There must be something going on here... >However if you are unable to ease	AJ Berger	-	7/13/1998
28	AJ, Contrary to popular belief, the cookies of your broker cannot talk to or r	Dan Good	-	7/13/1998
27	Anyone have any good Cookie Cutter Shareware? I'm concerned about my cooki	AJ Berger	-	7/13/1998
26	It is too bad Brad didn't use a more concrete example of misinformation in	246810	-	7/13/1998
25	Kerry, excellent find. At the very least it shows that the SEC is aware that so	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	7/13/1998
24	Without trying to minimize the privacy issue, it will be interesting to see wha	Mike K	-	7/12/1998
23	Josef, sec.gov Found this yesterday while researching something completely di	EL KABONG!!!	-	7/12/1998
22	Humbly report, CatLady, I also know nothing about the company, but it seems to	Josef Svejk	-	7/12/1998
21	I know nothing about the company or people involved. But it seems to be a <i	CatLady	-	7/12/1998
20	CatLady, Interesting. Fortunately, I have never posted there or about them. Ot	EL KABONG!!!	-	7/12/1998
19	Humbly report, CatLady, fascinating! Only two voices of opposition, out of 36	Josef Svejk	-	7/12/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):