SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Millionaire.com (OTC BB:MLRE) --Realistic expectations
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
132 1 0 MLRE
Emcee:  CoffeePot Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact

Millionaire.com plans to operate a website dedicated to connecting buyers and sellers of luxury items including antiques, yachts, classic autos, and much more. But are such offerings over the net practical????.......especially considering recent accounts of fraud over well known web auctioneer EBAY Message 6815774. Will people be buying luxury items worth tens of thousands of dollars over a medium still proving its safety and reliability to the everyday consumer??? It should also be noted that other companies have pursuied similar business strategies catering to the wealthy Subject 24051 with their success still undetermined.............

Also of concern is MLRE's status as a OTC: BB listed company. A company trading on the OTC is NOT required to release vital financial information to the investing public. Without this information it's nearly impossible to accurately value the company or determine it's potential. I just thought I'd include this note for new investors who heard of MLRE through its news releases on listed fully reporting companies TGLO & GCTY.

Realistically few penny stocks spend much time at these lofty valuations.......and without audited financial data it's impossible to know if MLRE even has the resources to attempt to enter their targeted market. For investors to use caution would be very prudent advice.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
132 Glad you enjoyed that Stock Detective article at stockdetective.com that exposepaulmcg0-12/31/1998
131 seven buxs ? The Dreamer sez we can buy more at seven bucks ? ( Keiko-12/21/1998
130 If I were to go long on any of these penny stocks it'd be Fortune MarketinCoffeePot-12/21/1998
129 A thread dedicated to RDIM was started over the weekend. At smallcapjournal.comJeffrey L. Henken-12/21/1998
128 Is there a RDIM thread...? Looks like a good portal to add to any site, MLRE, Wr.edwards-12/21/1998
127 RDIM, MLRE sister stock at Fortune Marketing is moving. Up at .38 from a close Jeffrey L. Henken-12/21/1998
126 Please put Seat Backs and Tray tables in the upright positions and tKeiko-12/21/1998
125 lance, MLRE gapping up big time now. 11 7/8 x 12, NITE vs OLIE Kimberly Lee-12/21/1998
124 Good Lance - <I>this time i said,no..........i am going to get off my lazMr. Jens Tingleff-12/21/1998
123 sir,thank you for that helpful hint.... yes i watch ebay and stocks like that aLANCE B-12/21/1998
122 Lance, These high trend volatile stocks will always end up having trouble. To Mr. Jens Tingleff-12/21/1998
121quote.yahoo.comSOROS-12/20/1998
120 What's the stock price? SAMOA1-12/20/1998
119 MLRE -- more than meets the eye. These guys are the FIRST on the Internet in tSOROS-12/20/1998
118Message 6913021SOROS-12/20/1998
117 don't know if he's wise or not, but I love a hot .50 cent stock more thWayne Rumball-12/20/1998
116 nice post. Wayne Rumball-12/20/1998
115 Hmmm, that you coffee? trying to figure this out. wasn't it you hyping umWayne Rumball-12/20/1998
114 I focused on this stock because a man I interviewed that is now a millionaire hSmiley-12/20/1998
113 coffee, man, call IR then post. Wayne Rumball-12/20/1998
112 I spoke with IR today, they said restricted 1 year, weren't too happy aboutWayne Rumball-12/20/1998
111 Why did you focus on this thread, this stock? ok, a plug, here's my threadWayne Rumball-12/20/1998
110 "when their target audience is the very wealthy?" WRONG. I have notSOROS-12/20/1998
109 No agenda. No bull. You know this may sound crazy...but I really want to make Smiley-12/20/1998
108 OK, maybe i was a little hyperactive. The questions n your other posts suggestWayne Rumball-12/20/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News