REAL SI PETITION FORUM | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
REAL SI PETITION FORUM

An SI Board Since July 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
105	7	0

Emcee: Neenny	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

REAL SI PETITION FORUM

They're gonna abandon the Real SI format and force a changeover to the New SI format. This looks like a more dedicated stock chat site - and it is styled after Yahoo and MFool. Here's the spot to voice your opinion - love it, hate it, what to do.

Important links!!
unicus.com
Subject 29753

This affects ALL of us. This is bigger than the Datek adlet. Pull out yer bagpipe and toot - one sounds pitiful, but a thousand sound awesome!!

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
105	I saw that the other night too. Let's see what becomes of it. Like he say	AugustWest	-	8/7/1999
104	This new format is garbage. Nothing but clutter, and it doesn't work as we	Boddington	-	8/6/1999
103	I think it shows promise.	Cheeky Kid	-	8/4/1999
102	Message 10814328 Check this out, folks - if it is suitable and acceptable.	Jacques Chitte	-	8/4/1999
101	<i> Or, as another put it, is the problem that the programmers are not ac	Pink Minion	-	8/4/1999
100	Haim, This all reminds me of the "massive" customer protests at	Yogizuna	-	8/4/1999
99	I wonder why they are doing things differently in the beta version of the messa	ILCUL8R	-	8/4/1999
98	They already have the data to put in the title when they are generating the pag	Pink Minion	-	8/4/1999
97	>>It should take them two minutes to fix.<< You said it all, and v	ILCUL8R	-	8/4/1999
96	If you are on Netscape, go the "View" on then "Page Source"	Pink Minion	-	8/3/1999
95	>> I told these clowns about this and they still haven't fixed it. Al	ILCUL8R	-	8/3/1999
94	>>Oh my goodness yes - I didn't notice that. I use Go habitually as w	ILCUL8R	-	8/3/1999
93	Oh my goodness yes - I didn't notice that. I use Go habitually as well, and	Jacques Chitte	-	8/3/1999
92	I told these clowns about this and they still haven't fixed it. All they h	Pink Minion	-	8/3/1999
91	>Glad you brought that up, Richard. So far as I know, nobody has done so ye	ILCUL8R	-	8/3/1999
90	Glad you brought that up, Richard. So far as I know, nobody has done so yet.	jbe	-	8/3/1999
89	Not only is the new beta ugly and hard to read, it is hard to navigate. In my	ILCUL8R	-	8/3/1999
88	Lets keep the old "real" SI alive. The new/beta is ugly, terribly un	Shafik Habal	-	8/3/1999
87	How is the petition thread going today??? I have not had much of a chance to	Neenny	-	8/3/1999
86	I see what you mean, Datek was in the transporter and now she is gone. More in	Blue Snowshoe	-	8/2/1999
85	The Datek button keeps coming&going today. GNET folks must be having their	Jacques Chitte	-	8/2/1999
84	Carl, I did not take it personally....I know better!!! but thanks for the exp	Neenny	-	8/2/1999
83	<i> SI has decided to respond publicly! we take you now to their official	Pink Minion	-	8/1/1999
82	<i>"my inquiries either public or private have yielded zippoh."	mr.mark	-	8/1/1999
81	By the way, nothing personal intended. That was a parody of Clinton's 1992	Carl R.	-	8/1/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):