SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Restored Posts from Residential Real Estate
An SI Board Since September 2011
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
46 11 0
Emcee:  SI Brad Type:  Moderated
In a first for SI, I am creating the first "tangential" subject. The first 21 posts here were deleted by SI admins last week from the The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-MODERATED subject. Some members have objected to the deletions, and quite frankly I'm not sure if we did the right thing or not....so I am restoring them for anyone who wishes to read them or continue the discussion.

Was SI wrong to remove the posts? Where do you draw the line on a "personal attack", and is it fair game to say anything you want about a "public" figure using an anonymous alias? What constitutes a "public" figure? Is this a "flame war"? At what point should flame-wars be stopped?
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
46IMO, most voters are not qualified to decide Many parents are I'll qualifiedTobagoJack310/9/2011
45Glad to hear it. As for the rest, it all just makes my head hurt ... This much Terry Maloney-10/9/2011
44Very true. And I still have a high regard for you, if you're wondering. I Box-By-The-Riviera™510/9/2011
43Hello Pecker Pole harvester <G> (that is your real name right?) I rememloantech-10/9/2011
42Just for the record, Box didn't 'snap' on me, he merely 'droppedTerry Maloney110/9/2011
41Gee i never heard of anyone else who went into the septembers of '08 and marcos410/8/2011
40Excellent post Lance.loantech310/8/2011
39Mr. Box (I'd post your real name, but Si would only delete it), I’m sure Lance_Lewis1910/8/2011
38You did not know, nor did you know the story, hence you beleive it is innuendo oJorj X Mckie1010/8/2011
37Absolutely correct. And I have no obligation to refrain from criticising it. So Box-By-The-Riviera™810/8/2011
36Absolutely correct. And I have no obligation to refrain from criticising it. SSI Brad410/8/2011
35Okay let's break this down: For example, his track record of written opinioBox-By-The-Riviera™510/8/2011
34Okay let's break this down: For example, his track record of written opiniSI Brad1410/8/2011
33Maybe you could have a permanent repository thread for such deleted posts. It coSmiling Bob110/8/2011
32LOLstomper-10/8/2011
31For example, his track record of written opinion during the gold bullion run-up Box-By-The-Riviera™310/8/2011
30Box, Do you have anything of substance to say about the quality of Mr. LewisSI Brad1010/7/2011
29you lost your head, when you posted beyond your costume. you did that. thatBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/7/2011
28[graphic]Jorj X Mckie310/7/2011
27one might suppose it takes time for the web of relationships to reach you Lance.Box-By-The-Riviera™-10/7/2011
26lance, or whoever you are could you answer this question Message 27671377 theBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/7/2011
25"we" to answer your question are the people who think "you"Box-By-The-Riviera™-10/7/2011
24Box-By-The-Riviera™110/7/2011
23you won't sue me, but of course on a bad day for you, you might actually tryBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/7/2011
22well lance you do know me. we've often chatted by telephone. i've actuBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/7/2011
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):