To: Dayuhan who wrote (44465 ) 7/8/1999 12:27:00 PM From: Ilaine Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
Sorry to read about the destruction of the coral. That sounds heartbreaking. >>>>>I wonder what Terrence would say about it; presumably that since nobody "owns" the coral reefs they should be free for anyone to mash; after all, what right does the government have to tell people where and how they can catch fish?<<<<< Excellent question. When I used to be active in the Libertarian party, I remember having a friendly debate about this over beer and pizza. I took the side of the fish. The most intelligent of my debaters decided that the solution was for someone to own the fish, and that someone should protect them. I suggested that, while fish are, and I am not sure I am spelling this right, and I am sure spellcheck would light up no matter if I did or didn't, ferae naturae, maybe we could say that "we" own the fish, and protect them for "us" - that there is incalculable benefit in protection of wildlife and wilderness. This was scoffed at - I don't think there is any place for these concepts in the Libertarian framework, which is quite reductionist, and this is the major reason I quit being a Libertarian. The sad thing is, there are laws to stop what is being done, but your local government is not powerful enough to stop it. What else can we do? Other than try to raise the consciousness of the consumer, so that demand for illegal goods will decline. Or take matters into one's own hand, try to enforce the law or what ought to be the law, through individual action. But that's probably just fantasy. I saw the most beautiful carved elephant tusks this past weekend at a museum - carved by Japanese artists into the most incredibly intricate forms - one of a monkey family that looked real - one of a battle between men on horses and monsters and dragons that would have looked real if dragons really existed. Of course, I thought about the poor elephant, but I looked at the carvings anyway.