SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Process Boy who wrote (71327)9/8/1999 12:20:00 AM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574212
 
PB,

Re: "AMD process"

I have posted several times that I agree that AMD is pushing the front end to or close to 0.18 micron. And have also cautioned my AMD kamikaze bretheren that it is therefore unlikely that a 2x speed improvement will show up in the move to 0.18 and Cu- as some have been hoping for.

On the other hand the next move on a 0.18 BEOL will be MUCH LOWER risk as they seem to have the FEOL under control and yielding so well.

So I think I have been fairly consistent on this. But I do expect a 50% improvement once Cu comes in as the RC delays will drop dramatically with Cu.

Now we also know that Intels 0.18 with coppermine BOMBED.
We also know that Leff on the transistors is now pushed well beyond 140nm to get to the 733Mhz speed grades.

One can almost say that intel is running a 0.13 FEOL with a 0.18 BEOL to compete with AMD's 0.25 K7's. Is this terrible news - not really it just shows how well Intel can perform under pressure.

I am basically taking umbrage at the crap on the PPC and Mots process and somehow that reflecting on how the K7 will scale.

If AMD does deliver 700-750Mhz K7's in coming few months, they should be applauded for it.

Not this ceaseless fud.

regards,

Kash



To: Process Boy who wrote (71327)9/8/1999 12:22:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574212
 
RE:"If AMD goes from 700 to 1000 on .25 in one jump, it'll be a historic
event. I'm basing this on my experience. If it scales to .25 over time, I
am not worried, based on what I have learned about AMD's current
process."

Where did you come up with the one jump scenario?



To: Process Boy who wrote (71327)9/8/1999 12:59:00 AM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574212
 
PB - RE: "what other .25 process runs at 1.6V?"

Don't Intel's notebook chips?