Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 7:12:00 PM
From: Labrador	Respond to of 152472

Thank you for sharing the information. Very informative.

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 7:27:00 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

Idler....Were you actually invited to the conference or did you just show up? I ask this because of the following post.... Message 11124187 I still do not understand how, in theory, any meeting such as this could be closed to the general public. If all information given out at the meeting is immaterial, then by definition it is useless or close to useless. If it is material, then it is illegal for it to be disseminated to a closed group without simultaneously making it public. I completely agree with the sentiments that you expressed above and hope that the conference was actually open to the public. Thanks for your synopsis. Slacker

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 7:37:00 PM
From: Uncle Frank	Respond to of 152472

Fantastic summary, idler. They sure schooled you in taking comprehensive notes at Stanford <g>. From your description, it sounds like the meeting was a hit! Many thanks, FranQ

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 7:41:00 PM
From: cfoe	Respond to of 152472

Excellent post. So much to absorb. Am printing it out for closer reading.

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 7:43:00 PM
From: Labrador	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

>> -- CDMA is only wireless technology that is internet capable<< Can anyone shed any insight in the how CMDA ties into the internet -- are we talking data capabilities? [I thought GSM handled data] thoughts here, and potential applications?

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 8:05:00 PM
From: Randall Knight	Respond to of 152472

Idler, was there any mention of how well Omnitracs, wireless cinema, Eudora, and the Wireless Knowledge joint venture are doing? All this talk about asics and IPR but what impact do all of the above have on earnings?

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 8:11:00 PM
From: GO*QCOM	Respond to of 152472

Thankyou for sharing your notes with all of us.This certainly sheds light on the very fast and changing business we are all participating in.QUALCOMM has planned wisely as in the past always looking to increase the power base for CDMA's global expansion.The eventual exit from the handset business makes sense since it is in the CDMA chip/brain development that will continue to evolutionize the way we communicate.QUALCOMM no doubt is creating the unstopable CDMA operating system with the embedment of Win CE into the CDMA chip set.Speed will become so very important and this is where every one else will take a back seat.

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 9:12:00 PM
From: John Biddle	Respond to of 152472

Thanks for the great summary. You're a credit to your thread <g>.

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 9:17:00 PM
From: puzzlecraft	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

"HDR will make the cell phone a network appliance" I thought I read somewhere that HDR will not be mobile. Can anyone point to a definitive statement about this? Is there a primer on HDR? John

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 9:20:00 PM
From: FedWatcher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Idler - great overview! Did they talk about G*? <EOM>

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 10:09:00 PM
From: MileHigh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

HDR?

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 10:11:00 PM
From: MileHigh	Respond to of 152472

Dr J: the cell phone will become the next computer This is what I was getting at a minute ago. MileHigh

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/15/1999 10:58:00 PM
From: SpudFarmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Idler: Your "few little notes" are better than most 'professional' journalists and writers best efforts. My compliments to your 'party crashing' ability and writing skill. I think if you make it out to the left coast, I owe you a nice fat lunch. Your effort is greatly appreciated. Will not comment on the content, other than to say "massive, massive business prospects" is a bull's eye! Q rocks. It is only a matter of time...

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/16/1999 2:08:00 AM
From: 16yearcycle	Respond to of 152472

What can one say. Shareholders have to read this and think, "Holy Shi*!!" I have been as excited about his since May as a once was with MSFT in 1993. The cell phone is the computer.

To: idler who wrote (41257)	9/16/1999 10:44:00 AM
From: SirWalterRalegh	Respond to of 152472

This was a great post. I look forward to the amendment. Does anyone know the relationship between Dr.Irwin Jacobs, Paul Jacobs and Jeff Jacobs? Rick Benfield