SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John F. Dowd who wrote (35103)12/6/1999 11:02:00 AM
From: Valley Girl  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
John:

What door? This development looks utterly irrelevant. Java has a lot of momentum behind it in the only arena that counts, the development community. Most people building Java applications today probably think ECMA is a skin disease.



To: John F. Dowd who wrote (35103)12/6/1999 11:34:00 AM
From: Bill Fischofer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
Re: Java

I've had a long-running disagreement with George Gilder on the subject of Java and its value to SUNW. The question, in a nutshell, is how will SUNW actually make money from Java? Note that to date it hasn't made a dime on the language as development and promotion expenses have far exceeded the modest licensing revenue they've collected. The irony is that SUNW is likely to make as much off of Java as T made off of C and C++ (both of which originated at Bell Labs). SUNW's attempts to maintain proprietary control over Java while at the same time promoting it as an "standard" goes against the entire history of programming language development and is something that standards bodies such as ISO and ECMA fully understand. See Message 12196985 for some additional details about the latest developments on this front.



To: John F. Dowd who wrote (35103)12/6/1999 5:07:00 PM
From: Paul Reuben  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 74651
 
"Alert: Us Justice Dept Says Multiple Violations of Antitrust Law by Microsoft"

biz.yahoo.com



To: John F. Dowd who wrote (35103)12/6/1999 9:08:00 PM
From: Brian Malloy  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 74651
 
For two years we have discussed this issue.

This would be the ultimate Monopoly. It would be like MSFT owning C and C++. It's one thing to make productivity tools for a language it is a whole different matter to own the language.

SUNW is a sheep in wolves clothing doing everything that it can to pull a fast one.