SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jmootx who wrote (48740)4/30/2000 9:13:00 PM
From: Stcgg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
The Nasdaq Didn't Have a Bubble..

Bubbles burst, whereas we got a nice healthy correction that bounced the Naz off it's Oct98 trendline.. IMO, nowhere to go but up now!

>><<



To: jmootx who wrote (48740)5/1/2000 7:44:00 PM
From: ekn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Did anyone hear someone come out and disparage the CPI#s late in the CNBC broadcast [i believe the person said it was "terrible"]? It sounded like gloom and doom. Also volume has been 20-30% lighter than the initial run-up. Wouldn't make more sense to have the markets CAPITULATE longer than 3 days and rebuild a strong fundamental base between 3000--3500 setting the stage for a run to 6000 within 2-3 years? does that not make sense? Is cisco going to be valued@ 1 trillion on earnings of single-digit billions? Where do you make money in Cisco right now other than short? I started to slowly build a new short position and will cost average up as I think that babyHAS to give it up. I can see it reasonably valued NOW @ 40-50 a share and 100-110 a share 5 YEARS from now!



To: jmootx who wrote (48740)5/1/2000 11:53:00 PM
From: 16yearcycle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99985
 
Gosh, you have a problem with number one and so I stopped right there:

"1. PE ratios for blue chip stocks, like GE and Cisco are now reaching FOUR times the company growth rate. (bubble)"

Let's try some facts. GE is expected to earn about 3.75 this year and has been growing e at right around 20%. So the peg ratio is actually right at 2.1. Oh, if you don't like me projecting forward, we still get under 2.3. 2.3 is different than 4.

CSCO is expected to earn over .65 in the next fiscal year. It has been growing in excess of 50% per year. So we get a peg of about 2.3. OK, the fiscal year doesn't start for another q so if we go by the current .52 pace, we get 2.73, not 4.0. is 2.73 too high? Yes, I think so, but it isn't 4.

Currently we have a lot of growth stocks with peg's between 1 and 2. Very few are much above 2.0. On March 10, we had a tremendous number over 2.0 and it should have been a warning, so I agree with your concept, but I think it is important to get the numbers right.



To: jmootx who wrote (48740)5/2/2000 12:12:00 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 99985
 
jmootx, after 7000 years of walking, mankind has gone from 5 miles an hour, to the speed of light, in less than 200 years.

I cannot imagine a more exciting time to be living in than right now.

I don't know were the market will be in the next year, and neither do you, or anyone else.

I do know that the technological revolution that started with Newton in 1666 has now accelerated beyond anyone's imagination of say, 20 years ago. We are going though a period of growth that we cannot really get our hands on.

When you say that you are advising people to get out of the market, I understand your position, and would not argue with you. I have decided that bears like you have a permanent negative attitude on life, and that you will not change your position.

The problem with people like you is that it is easy to scare people, and you, and others like you, have kept a lot of investors out of the greatest bull market the world has ever seen over the last 8 years.

I know you will keep up your "Gloom and Doom" predictions. I really feel sorry for you, and anyone who heeds you. Whatever way the market goes, it is a shame to go through life always expecting the worst.



To: jmootx who wrote (48740)5/2/2000 1:52:00 AM
From: Daskin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99985
 
I agree with you that this market is a bubble, and we have seen how worse it could be. But that doesn't mean we should pull everything we have out and pretend that there is no good stock out there.

Just because it is a bubble, we should be more careful to pick stocks worth the high valuation. But I don't believe this is it...

Technology will keep pushing things and create a new world.
Of course, not all companies will be involved in this. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying Internet companies will be. It depends on what kind of technology or services they sell. It is really case by case.

All I want to say is:
"Don't turn over the boat because you hate one of the passengers."

It is a bubble, but it will only burst where it should.



To: jmootx who wrote (48740)5/2/2000 3:20:00 PM
From: eichler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Howdy jmootx,
I've been following this thread for the last several weeks and noticed your several recent posts. Your post advising
people to sell the rallies, I rejected out of hand as the typical gloom and doom I found saturating this thread. But as your post inspired several replies and obviously stimulated
some thinking, I must concede that your post was in that
respect, good. I checked out your previous posts, as you
recommend, and find your thinking confused at best.
Your first post was a letter or reply you obtained from
a Mr. Kudlow. The message was basicly a defense of stock
valuations as not over-priced, but priced with Growth rates
and technology boom in mind. The letter was rather bullish
and I thought, interesting. In another post, you mention yourself as a mid-cap growth investor. By definition, I
figured you to be somewhat bullish as I would expect a Bear
to be more value oriented, rather than Growth.
A week later, another interesting post illustrating the obvious similarities between the 1929 crash and the current
correction (ended or ending according to my perception).
Then another post referring to the possible Back Monday that
was coming (didn't happen, did it?). At least I want to thank
you for not being the idiot who said BLACK MONDAY COMES.
Your next message proclaims the individual has a disease
followed by your now famous "bubble bubble, boil and trouble"
speech. I was pretty much happy to pass over your rantings and continue on my own path when I read the critical response
today that you responded to in such an interesting way.
When confronted by your negative views, you advised the criticizer to study the market as it exists....
I'm sorry but I just can't hold back anymore.
First of all, how did you change from a bull to a bear so damn fast? Second, although the 1929 comparison was interesting, it is important to realize that this is NOT 1929. There are so many differences between then and now, I just don't know where to start... I guess the most important
factor is that in this, the computer age, investors are far
more informed and therefore better equipped to deal with the
adversity and games that are played in the marketplace. If you really want to study the market as it exists, maybe you
should start by stop pretending that this is 1929, revisited.
As far as the "bubble", that is certainly debatable and perhaps even called into question by your post from Mr. Kudlow. For a moment, let's say you are right and that it
is real and now. OK. No problem. Except that you are so smart
you can apparently foretell WHEN that bubble will burst and hence advise people to take their money and run. I am not that smart. In fact, I am so stupid, I actually had the audacity to increase my portfolio 100% last year and another
100% (so far) this year by buying low and selling high, in the face of a gigantic BUBBLE. What a speculator I must be...
Oh, by the way, what if the bubble doesn't burst right yet?
What if it doesn't happen until much later this year? What
if it doesn't happen until next year, or the year 2008? What
if the market simply keeps doing what it does, goes up, goes
down, goes up, down, up...? Maybe I should forget about technical analysis, charts, recalling the current economic
climate(boom). After all, it's one big bubble and will undoubted blow up in my face. YOU have spoken...
Getting away from the sarcasm for a moment, I would like to
mention that when I look at a long-term chart of the NAZ, one
can see a clear parabolic rise leading us to the present. If
one draws a curve following the lows upward, I don't believe the current correction has even broken the present uptrend (again from a long-term view). It is entirely conceivable to
me that this correction is only a rest before further stratospheric gains to come. I don't count on it, but I don't
preclude it either. I will simply continue to let the market
do the talking on the charts, buy when you bears are growling
the most, sell when you guys crawl back in your caves for
hibernation. Isn't it funny how bulls are most bullish at the tops and bears most bearish at the bottoms? The key is not to get sucked in by the hype. Buy low, sell high. Or -
sell high, then buy low. That's what affects the bottom line
of my portfolio, not bubble talk...
Short-term, the recent rally has violated the upper recent
downtrend line. That is a buy signal in my book. As far as the lack of volume, I would expect that to pick up when recently battered investors peek out into the sunlight. Yeah,
there is sunlight out there.
Sincerely,
Eichler