Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lola who wrote (1679)	5/10/2001 2:56:14 PM
From: Tim Luke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

why?...you asked a normal question. what a joke

To: Lola who wrote (1679)	5/10/2001 2:59:34 PM
From: bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

Lola, I got the same PM from him a little while ago.

To: Lola who wrote (1679)	5/10/2001 3:50:01 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5315

A few polite posts about a stock call on a stock message board qualifies as harrassment in Ihub Bob's books but what Jenna did, posting private information about one of her subscribers, did not appear to qualify as harrassment in Ihub Bob's books. Ihub Bob really needs to get a clue! How do you know that he did not consider it to be harrassment? Didn't you notice that Jenna stopped posting for several days after that post was made....and subsequently deleted? Just because he didn't announce it to you that he had taken action, doesn't mean that he didn't do anything about it. Since his policy is to not talk to other people when a member is suspended, it isn't surprising that we didn't hear anything...but Jenna sure was quiet for a few days.