SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (156656)1/24/2002 3:33:39 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul, <The pricing of AMD's AThyWipers are in FREE FALL on pricewatch.com>

Maybe the "QuantiSpeed" marketing isn't holding up after all.

Tenchusatsu



To: Paul Engel who wrote (156656)1/24/2002 7:39:34 AM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: The pricing of AMD's AThyWipers are in FREE FALL on pricewatch.com

Good.

Short term, I think market share is more important for AMD. I'm sure you noticed that I got pretty quiet when it became clear that AMD raised its ASPs and revenue at the cost of 1 to 2 percent in market share last quarter.

AMD understood that moving from .25 to .13 during the past 2 years reduced that number of FABs required, and that it should result in chips being less expensive.

Intel has locked itself into a high cost structure, AMD hasn't. AMD is in a great position to lower prices, Intel isn't. It's the perfect time for AMD to lower prices and gain market share, too bad for Intel.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (156656)1/24/2002 9:08:51 AM
From: John F. Dowd  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul: Why does Dan3 think INTC is locked into fabs that are inefficient vis a vis .13. I mean what are they going to spend the .5 billion on - Maintenance? JFD