Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (75679)	2/19/2003 3:32:31 PM
From: paul_philp	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

And that rude rejection of W. European interests, is exactly why we won't have a division of French tanks alongside us when our army crosses the Iraqi border. What material objections were rudely rejected? It is the very lack of seriousness that demonstrates that Chirac is playing an internal political game. Remember Blair standing up at the EU dinner the other night, looking each leader in the eye and saying "All you intelligence agencies know what WMD Saddam has". It is Chirac that is being rude and duplicitous and you want to honour him. Paul

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (75679)	2/19/2003 4:39:15 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

OT-Re Kyoto...Remember Jacob...This was not passed by the US House nor the US Senate during the 8 year Clinton Administration....If you do some research on Kyoto, you will see why. It was faulty, and certainly not good for the US. BTW, there is AMPLE material on the web, pro and con, on Kyoto...

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (75679)	2/19/2003 6:09:30 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Jochen - the Kyoto treaty was dead in the water even when Clinton was President. The US Senate vote against it was unanimous (95-0). Even the most liberal Democrat Senator would not vote for it.