SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Heinz Blasnik- Views You Can Use -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 2:44:54 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 4904
 
Great post
M



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 2:56:59 PM
From: Stephen  Respond to of 4904
 
Heinz, great to see you back posting. I hope life has been treating you well these last 3-4 years...(or however long its been ....)

Best regards

stephen



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 3:10:33 PM
From: orkrious  Respond to of 4904
 
awesome, welcome back, heinz



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 3:41:25 PM
From: NOW  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4904
 
Aloha Heinz! great summary of the financial house of cards of Japan. I have a difficult time reconciling the huge financial problems confronting Japan (and you summarized them well, leaving out the role of Yakuza) with the strong sense that Japan fundamentally is a very sound manufacturing base with an incredible workforce and inovative corporations. Did you see this article?
prudentbear.com



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 3:46:03 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4904
 
thanks heinz



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 5:09:01 PM
From: No Mo Mo  Respond to of 4904
 
I have my homework for the evening. Thanks!

I'm generally a pretty happy guy with a good life, but seeing your name up here again has been the high point of my day. Welcome back!



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 5:11:36 PM
From: Paul Shread  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4904
 
Welcome back, you bear klown. -g- Great post. <eom>



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 6:01:38 PM
From: the_wheel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4904
 
Welcome Back Heinz!

Now here in USA the talk seems to have gone from stocks to Real Estate. Given your prescient remarks on stocks, suggest some discussion regarding RE considering the increase in RE prices during this economic contraction.



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 6:06:59 PM
From: JRI  Respond to of 4904
 
Heinz- We all appreciate your (continuing?) efforts to give us more of your time! g You (and your outstanding writing/thinking) have been sorely missed...



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 6:27:13 PM
From: re3  Respond to of 4904
 
Welcome back Heinz !



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 6:30:02 PM
From: Oblomov  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4904
 
Heinz, great to see you again, and as always, your comments are thoughtful. I suppose that an even bigger question is whther you think that the same mistakes are being committed in the US economy. Enron, Worldcom, USAir, United, KMart, etc. have each been allowed to fail, sometimes spectacularly. I think that this is a good thing, especially since it sets the proper precedent for the bankruptcy 'surprises' to come...

Zum Wohl...



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 6:35:39 PM
From: chris714  Respond to of 4904
 
Well it's about time! -g-

Great to see you back Heinz.

I'm still holding my gold/silvers..some juniors as well.

You have been sorely missed on SI. We have been saving a spot for you.

Welcome again.

Chris



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 6:53:53 PM
From: LTK007  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4904
 
Heinz knowing your tendency to have scorn to those supposed to be Keynesian experts <economically illiterate Keynesian incompetents> can i assume your of the austrian economic school???
In other words would that assumption give a handle to what goes into your analysis???
Mind your being Austrian does not lead me to make such an assumption:)
But if i am assumming incorrectly let me know. Max



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 7:08:39 PM
From: Pacing The Cage  Respond to of 4904
 
Welcome Back Heinz.
We've missed you!



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 7:09:30 PM
From: UnBelievable  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4904
 
It Wasn’t For Want Of Trying

"for one thing, we have just seen the traditional Japanese government fiscal year end stock market manipulation scheme fail for the first time"

The dollars recent attempt to rally off the lows in March was due to massive FX market interventions aimed at keeping the N225 (and the DJX) above 8000 for the March 31 mark to market parody.

I'm sure that Al appreciated this effort, particularly the week of March 17 when he flooded the market with dollars to slap down the bond market, and thereby get all those asset allocation programs to start pulling money out of debt and into equity.

I think March represented a new level of coordination of the market intervention (manipulation) efforts on the part of the G7 (or at least some of them, anyway). Under the mantle of national security Gold, Oil, FX, Debt and Equity all got "fixed".

If such efforts could actually do anything we wouldn't be entering a global economic winter.

While Sec. Snow (you get snow in the winter <gg> made it clear that he was more than OK with the devaluation of the clownbuck I expect that before long he is going to have a new appreciation of the dangers of having prayers answered.

While Mr. Busch mad it clear to the world that the US is willing to act unilaterally in its own interest, without consideration for the rest of the world's opinion.

I wonder if the impact of this on other countries willingness to continue to use dollars as their main reserve currency was considered.

The attempt on the part of the world's central banks to "diversify" their reserve holdings, combined with the Fed's current policy manifesto "inflate or die" will help ensure that the dollar continues to seek its true value.

I wonder at what point those countries that do not agree with the US realize that they can achieve much more by selling dollars than they can by bombast and rhetoric at the UN.

Not with standing the above Gold suks.



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 7:13:54 PM
From: LTK007  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4904
 
Your writing here is falling along lines as to why Dr.Marc Faber(the printing press kept ever active and CBs throwing paper all about to sandbag and sandbag) feels you can't go wrong buying Gold/GoldStocks now given that he feels this will be a bull sector over the next ten years.
Would you, or have you entered the gold sector on a longterm basis?Max



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 7:29:52 PM
From: Joan Osland Graffius  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4904
 
heinz,

Thanks for taking the time to share your wisdom on Japan. You have been missed.

Take care, Joan



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 7:39:21 PM
From: Giordano Bruno  Respond to of 4904
 
Once again, a great read.

Thanks Heinz

Regards,
Jim



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 8:50:33 PM
From: ild  Respond to of 4904
 
Heinz, welcome home!



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 8:57:17 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 4904
 
Hello heinz, I have bookmarked the thread and intend to scavenge some collected thoughts that helps me to navigate the financial mine field and economic jungle:0)

Good that you have returned from somewhere.
Chugs, Jay



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 10:13:36 PM
From: PMG  Respond to of 4904
 
freut mich echt, dass Du wieder aufgetaucht bist...!

Viele Grüße
PMG



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 11:00:05 PM
From: AllansAlias  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4904
 
Welcome back you old freak. -g Views I can use eh? Hell, I don't care how usable they are. All I know, is that the collective IQ of SI went up a notch today.

I have fond memories of trying to "out grim" each other back when the NASDAQ was still printing 4000. The bear has years left in it and I'd like to think we'll be around long after we've bounced out of the final low.

I thought of you the other day when GE Capital sold Air Canada a big chunk of credit. The credit selling business is still hot. There'll be no TL&EV and dogs and cats sleeping together until we deal with the credit vendors.

I hope you are well and it is good to see you slummin' again.

Allan



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/9/2003 11:37:01 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™  Respond to of 4904
 
today's lance lewis on the "end" of the war among other things




April 9, 2003

Statues Fall And So Do Stocks


Asia was lower last night, with Japan falling a percent and headed back towards Nikkei 8000. Hong Kong also fell 2 percent and is once again challenging its lows for the year. The excuse may be SARS, but the general Asian market weakness of late definitely bears watching. Europe was off a touch this morning, and the US futures were also a little weaker despite the fact that the US military had said that the Iraqi regime was no longer in control of Iraq and that the campaign had reached a “tipping point,” meaning that we were closing in on the end game.

That is to say that the futures were weaker until TV news stations began broadcasting jubilant Iraqi civilians pulling down a statue of Saddam Hussein in Baghdad. Suddenly, the futures caught a bid, as Heehaw (that’s CNBC for new readers) gleefully pronounced that a big rally was due when the statue fell (I kid you not. That phrase actually came out of somebody’s mouth). We opened higher and quickly sold off back to the morning’s lows in the futures when it appeared to be taking too long to drag down the statue. Finally, we made a slingshot move back to the highs as the statue was pulled down by a US tank, and that was the high for the day.

We quickly rolled over and sunk to a new low for the day and the week as the “news” that the war was effectively over was sold. A bounce unfolded from there and retook about half the day’s losses until a selloff in the last 30 minutes sent us plunging to new lows for the day, taking us out on the very worst levels of the session. Buy the cannon, sell the trumpets is the old adage about stocks and wars. Today once again proved that old adage to be true. With the fall of the statue, the war is symbolically over. The trumpets sounded victory, and down we went. As we’ve noted over the last few days, the market has clearly been anticipating this already, as positive war news has had less and less of an effect on financial markets in recent days. Volume was just OK (1.3 bil on the NYSE and 1.3 bil on the NASDAQ). Breadth was slightly negative on both exchanges.

The semis spent most of the day trying to bounce back after yesterday’s pounding but in the end were dragged under along with everything else. Losses were small in most cases, however. The equips were similarly stronger for most of the day but gave up the ghost in the afternoon and were generally under a little more pressure than the chips, with losses of 2 to 4 percent being the norm. The SOX fell 2 percent to a new low for the move and just shy of its early April low.

The rest of tech was weak across the board. MSFT played a bit of catch-up and fell 4 percent. The Internet trash finally ran into some trouble as well. AMZN fell 6 percent to a new low for the move and the month. EBAY slumped 3 percent. YHOO fell 4 percent and back to its low for the month ahead of its earnings to be released after the close. Even the Chinese Internet trash (SOHU, SINA, etc) was smacked around to the tune of 5 percent on average. Tonight we’ll hear from YHOO. What the company reports and guides to is irrelevant. At 130x trailing and 14x sales, just about anything good they could say is more than fully discounted. All we are interested in is the reaction. If bad news is sold or good news is not bought, then we’ll have another sign that the market is ready to soften up on next week’s guidance from the rest of corporate America. Let’s wait and see what happens, but judging by the breakdowns in these Internet stocks today (as well as the biotechs, with the BTK making a new low for the month), the rally has hit the wall, and trouble is on the way.

Financials were also weaker. The BKX and XBD both fell 2 percent. The derivative king fell a percent, and GE fell 3 percent. Credit insurers were off a percent on average and continue to hold together fairly well. FRE and FNM both fell a percent.

Retailers were weaker across the board, with the RTH falling 2 percent. WMT also fell 2 percent. Homebuilders resisted the general market selloff and were mostly higher by a percent or so despite HOV guiding full year 2003 earnings above its own previous guidance but below consensus estimates, which I must admit is somewhat of a bullish sign. The market appears to believe that homebuilding will continue to be strong as long as interest rates remain low (there’s also typically a spike in building even as rates rise off a low because people rush to lock in rates). So, perhaps the homebuilders can revisit their highs over the next several months? I’m not so sure about that, but it’s possible I suppose. The mortgage bubble continues to somehow miraculously hold together and may continue to do so until long-term interest rates begin to rise.

Crude oil rose 85 cents or 3 percent after US inventories unexpectedly fell and OPEC made noises about cutting production at its April 24th meeting. The XOI fell a hair, and the OSX rose a percent. The XNG rose a freckle. The CRB rose a touch and is closing in on a new high for the move off the March 26th low. Gold opened up a dollar in NY this morning and then sold off a couple bucks once the statue toppling nonsense started in the equity market. Once the statue had fallen though, the metal began rallying and steadily marched higher for the rest of the session to a new high for the day. There was a small giveback before the close, but the metal essentially ended on the highs, up $3.30 to $326.50. The HUI rose 4 percent to a new high for the week and just shy of a new high for the move off the March 13th low. The gold shares continue to outperform the metal, and I expect further gains in the coming weeks. The catalyst for further gains may be just be a bit of post-war inflation.

The US dollar index fell a touch to a new low for the week. The yen slipped a touch, and the euro rose to a new high for the week. Treasuries were up a touch, with the yield on the 10yr falling to 3.9%.

Investor’s Intelligence revealed that bulls have risen to 51.1 percent, which is back to their highs seen in late November of 2002, while bears have sunk again to 31.1 percent. Here again, sentiment readings continue to signal danger, but then again, they have been signaling danger for some time.

Today marked the de facto end to the war I think, and the market’s reaction was predictably to sell the news. We’re still in the twilight period between the war rally and what I expect will be a renewed focus on economic and company fundamentals, but I do think there’s a good chance that next week’s lukewarm guidance will be sold. Tech will likely be hit the hardest since that’s where valuations are stretched the most in an environment that continues to see no pickup in IT spending. Looking further out, I do think we’ll see some sort of global consumer economic blip due to post-war relief (throw in some dying down of the SARS hysteria, and Asia could really see a pop), so retailers may or may not hold up a little better. All of that is inflationary for the US of course, and I doubt the bounce in consumer spending in the US will last very long (an inflationary move in commodities right in front of a US recession is fairly common historically). That should of course be a big positive for gold and its shares, and I expect new highs in the shares at some point over the next few months. As I have said before, the Fed is inflating; don’t fight the Fed. Now, that doesn’t mean “buy stocks,” because inflating doesn’t guarantee economic or earnings growth, but it does guarantee higher basic commodity prices and a lower dollar.

So, let’s see how the market digests YHOO tomorrow and whether the selling continues or not, but I suspect we have a pretty good chance of revisiting the lows of the 9-month trading range over the next couple weeks as the pleasant distraction of the war fades away. “Investors” (and I use that term loosely in this market) will now have to turn once again and focus on absurd US equity valuations in the face of nonexistent earnings growth as we stand on the brink of a consumer-led recession. It’s all part of the post-bubble world. You either “get it” or you don’t, as a friend of mine is fond of saying. Of course, we can’t expect too much focus on reality. Hope for the fabled second half should keep things from getting too out of hand to the downside. But, let’s not get too ahead of ourselves. The March 31 lows need to be taken out before we can say with any certainty that some sort of top is in.





While I cannot provide personalized investment advice or recommendations, I welcome feedback and observations by subscribers.
You can email me at Lance Lewis.


Disclaimer: Lance Lewis periodically publishes columns expressing his personal views regarding particular securities, securities market conditions, and personal and institutional investing in general, as well as related subjects.

Mr. Lewis is the president of Lewis Capital, which manages a hedge fund in Dallas, Texas. This fund regularly buys, sells, or holds securities that are the subject of his columns, or options with respect to those securities, and regularly holds positions in such securities or options as of the date those columns are published. The views and opinions expressed in Mr. Lewis' columns are not intended to constitute a description of the securities bought, sold, or held by the fund. The views and opinions expressed in Mr. Lewis' columns are also not an indication of any intention to buy, sell, or hold any security on behalf of the fund, and investment decisions made on behalf of the fund may change at any time and for any reason. Mr. Lewis' columns are not intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.


Copyright © 2002 Lewis Capital, Inc. All rights reserved.



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/10/2003 10:48:12 AM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4904
 
hi Heinz,
in looking at the bank crisis in Japan, i believe we need to consider their trade policy and what it means for the US. what is the trade policy? for 100 years, it has been to build industrial capacity exceeding domestic needs, in order to support a structural current account surplus. originally the goal was to acquire foreign exchange sufficient for Japan to finance its own industries, but subsequently they realized that a rising yen (a result of the trade imbalance) would reduce the competitiveness of Japanese exports.

therefore, Japan adopted the historically unique position (for a country running such a large structural surplus) of accepting the fiat currency of a debtor nation (the United States) in lieu of gold or its own currency. (even before Nixon closed the gold window, which was done largely due to pressure from the increasingly undervalued yen, it was never the Japanese who complained of an overvalued dollar. it was a fiesty French economic minister, as i recall, who bemoaned America's "deficit without tears.") the problem was, Japan could not recycle these dollar payments into yen without driving up the yen. in order to maintain the strength of the dollar, therefore, Japan has elected over the years to acquire a burgeoning portfolio of foreign assets, such that it now has the largest net external asset position of any country in history.

unfortunately, every asset must be funded by a liability. in Japan's case, funding these external assets required the MoF and BoJ to create yen liabilities within Japan. the approach adopted in the 1970s, and again in the 1980s, was to create a real estate asset bubble. a real estate bubble creates capital gains which are not part of real economic activity. these gains, captured as profits (by constituents supporting the LDP, namely farmers and executives of construction firms), were placed, alongside wage-earner savings resulting from real economic activity, as stable deposits in the Japanese banking system to fund the overseas assets.

unfortunately, all bubbles must burst, and leave a debt overhang in their wake. in the 1970s, Japan was fortunate in that oil shock-related inflation allowed bad debts to be inflated away. Japan made the mistake of thinking this would happen again in the 1980s.

the policies instituted by the MoF and BoJ during this period relied on some unique aspects of Japanese finance. firstly, Japanese banks, as opposed to equity markets, were the key sources of funds for Japanese industries. they were intent on not relinquishing this status, and maintained considerable leverage with industrial "partners". to achieve the goal of increasing systemwide credit (and liabilities to fund burgeoning foreign assets), the MoF and BoJ used banks as a funnel via industrial cos to create a land bubble.

a second key aspect was that bank loans, while formally written up as short-term agreements, were informally understood to be "evergreen"--i.e., the principal need not be paid back as long as the loan was serviced. furthermore, underwriting was not based on a co's cash flow to service their loan, but rather the co's collateral. collateral in this case consisted of the co's real estate assets in Japan.

what happened was cos were "force-fed" loans by their "main banks", and they used these loans to buy real estate. this caused real estate to rise, and each incremental price increase on a given transaction raised the collateral available to all landholders. this led to a Ponzi scheme which is well known to buyers of US Internet stocks in the late 90s.

MoF officials probably knew the bubble would end, but figured they could inflate their way out of it. unfortunately, Japan's cumulative current account surplus had grown so large (now totalling some 200 trillion yen), and domestic capacity so excessive compared to domestic demand, that deflationary pressures could not be overcome.

as a result, the bad debts from the 1980s RE and stock bubbles remain on the books at face value, and have merely grown in real terms due to deflation. since many transactions were done at ludicrous land values, there was no way landowners could service their loans out of cash flow. these loans are now insolvent, the borrowers having gone bankrupt in many cases or persisting merely as zombies, and rest on bank books.

if bank assets were marked to market value, they would be shown to be less than liabilities, which would cause a run on banks.

theoretically, one solution Japan has to this problem is to repatriate its external assets. a capital infusion of several trillion dollars could certainly help bank finances. unfortunately, this would drive up the yen and cause the dollar to tank. as a result, Japan would be thrown into a severe recession as their excess industrial capacity would be put out of commission.

land prices would be driven down to the point where cos could produce cash flow to cover payments while being internationally competitive. as it stands, they are competitive not thanks to cash flow, but due to their dependence on banks.

but this whole jerry-rigged system is now coming apart at their seams, to the point where banks and group cos are being forced to liquidate their cross shareholdings. this is one more nail in the coffin of Japanese banks' capital adequacy as per BIS rules. (the banks' satisfying the capital ratios requires them to count cross shareholdings, which are in fact nothing but treasury stock and thus phantom capital.)

it seems likely that the government will continue its erratic behavior to try to maintain the status quo. (for the past decade, in the wake of a popped land bubble, that has meant unprecedented deficit spending, which lines the pockets of LDP insiders and construction firms.)

the situation has been coming to a head in recent years. this is obvious from the plunge of the Nikkei, which as you point out, has continued to outperform on the downside whenever the limbo bar is lowered. perhaps the deflationary and competitive pressure from China and other Asian rivals is accelerating this trend.

eventually the whole spiral will unravel and the consequences are extremely grave for the United States. Japanese will have to start liquidating foreign assets. i can only imagine that the US dollar will be obliterated (no more "deficit without tears"), and perhaps set off a global depression.



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/10/2003 11:03:34 AM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4904
 
you're an investment cult phenomena <g>

I see we aren't wasting any time in Iraq -- we're sending over the big guns ... er a big banker to restore order. Never mind that he is wanted for bank fraud in Syria or Jordan.

Thanks for dropping in when you can.

BTW -- Don't hate me for being superstitious, but I'm taking your return here as a good sign for the dirts. <vbg>



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/10/2003 2:58:24 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Respond to of 4904
 
Japanese Vampire tactics are killing their keiretsus / jw



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/10/2003 7:03:41 PM
From: Don Green  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4904
 
Heinz

Long time no chat, I see you are addressing my area of interest Japan.. please keep an eye on my (World Outlook) Subject 18341 thread. I post many things about Japan there. BTW one of the best books about the problems in Japan I have ever read and almost totally agree with is " Dogs and Demons: Tales form the Dark Side of Modern Japan" by Alex Kerr amazon.com

Yoroshiku

Don



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/16/2003 9:50:09 AM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4904
 
let's see -- PPI up and away, but CPI flat -- wonder what that does to profit margins?? and how does that bode for a recovery??



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/16/2003 11:39:53 PM
From: LLCF  Respond to of 4904
 
Good to see you back, hope all is well.

DAK



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/24/2003 3:03:32 PM
From: ild  Respond to of 4904
 
SoAf Rand is making new high -- up 3%

quotes.ino.com



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)4/25/2003 10:26:46 PM
From: Paul Shread  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4904
 
Did Puetz have any data on lunar eclipses that come before solar eclipses?

sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov

I believe the Puetz crash cycle is a solar eclipse followed by a lunar eclipse.



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)5/20/2003 3:04:25 AM
From: fedhead  Respond to of 4904
 
Welcome back Heinz. Glad to see you posting again.

Anindo



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (1)6/10/2003 4:56:26 PM
From: Logain Ablar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4904
 
Hi Heinz:

A site posted by iso on the strictly drilling thread. Its oil & gas reading you will enjoy.

peakoil.net