SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Legacy Interface Discussion (2004-2011) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SI Bob who wrote (307)4/28/2004 2:47:17 PM
From: SI Dave  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6035
 
>>The site will eventually include previous aliases in searches on members.

Are going to try and remedy the issue of duplicate aliases?



To: SI Bob who wrote (307)4/30/2004 1:33:07 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6035
 
The site will eventually include previous aliases in searches on members.

Would it be correct to assume that when someone changes their alias on the new site that all their prior posts reflect the new name (as is the case currently)? While on the one hand it would be confusing to leave the old names intact (even if you could search through them as one entity), it's always also a bit confusing to read a reply that addresses someone by a prior alias.

Similarly, while it would be very helpful to see someone's prior aliases in their profile, I can see cases where someone who stopped using a variant of his real name might not want their prior aliases being so public.

- Jeff



To: SI Bob who wrote (307)4/30/2004 10:40:40 AM
From: Kayaker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6035
 
I expect to have search include previous aliases before the Dev site becomes the production site.

If someone is using their real name as their alias and then for whatever reason they wish to become anonymous, should that not be respected?



To: SI Bob who wrote (307)5/1/2004 3:22:22 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6035
 
<font color=red>BAD IDEA!</font>
Subject 54913