Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (10231)	3/6/2005 7:36:39 PM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

RE: "In fact, it presents serious evidence that no planes were involved in the "attack", whatsoever." If you'll pardon me for pointing out the obvious, the logic behind showing photos of a plane hitting a building, as proof a plane didn't hit the building, completely escapes me.

To: sea_urchin who wrote (10231)	3/6/2005 10:00:08 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Re: I am thoroughly confused because I did believe that real aircraft were involved. In your case, we can't blame it on premature senescence, I guess. You are now swallowing the hologram disinformation? Please advise your wife to take away all financial decisions from you. You're obviously losing your marbles.

To: sea_urchin who wrote (10231)	3/8/2005 3:54:36 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Re: it presents serious evidence that no planes were involved in the "attack", whatsoever. The argument fully supports what Gus has said all along, which I suppose is an automatic reason for Ray, and others, to completely discount it with contempt. Well, Ray, Don and their fellow right-wing freaks dismiss the "no-planes" theory with contempt because it doesn't fit their ideological agenda... Their main concern seems basically to bash the "big, ugly, federal government" whether the Dems are in power or the Repubs, it just doesn't matter to them --Washington is evil... See, according to their right-wing worldview, a Democratic administration framed "poor McVeigh" --a brave Gulf War vet-- into entangling himself in the OKC conspiracy... And today, the Repubs have likewise bamboozled US opinion about 911: the ugly US government was in cahoots with "ugly Saudis" to cold-bloodedly murder thousands of Americans! That's in a nutshell, Ray & Don's tall-tale theory on 911. Now, an important feature of US right-wing dingbats is their unwavering devotion to the US military: when Ray is not lashing out at the evil federal government, he's likely fiddling with his Heckler&Koch in his Oregon bunker... watching the sky in the expectation of an imminent assault by UN gunships... And of course, he's in constant touch with fellow right-wing nuts based at the local Army barracks... So, what's wrong with the no-plane theory then? Well, fact is, civilian airliners WERE hijacked on 911 to begin with. If those airliners were not crashed into the WTC and the Pentagon, what happened to them? Simply: they were shot down by USAF jetfighters. OOooh, NO! Brave, all-American, true-born patriots like USAF pilots would NEVER, ever carry out such a direful mission!! Can you imagine that?!? Brave, white, churchgoing USAF officers shooting down commercial jetliners packed with hundreds of fellow joe-six-packs??? Fat chance! Only ugly sand-ngers like bin laden and zarqawi are capable of such atrocities... Praise to the US military! Honor and glory to the USAF, the true guardians of America --God bless them all! Now, as Don suggested, don't delay and call your nearest NRA outfit: IMO, 9/11 researchers should be spending a lot more time working with the NRA, and a lot less time working with Green Peace. Armies of quacking ducks do not decide history.* Message 21106120