SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (256440)6/24/2010 9:37:54 AM
From: John ChenRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
" But I think Petraeus might actually be a great candidate "

Depending if he has gut, or just a 'yes sir' man.
( "team" player ).

AWESOME.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (256440)6/24/2010 9:44:17 AM
From: Think4YourselfRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 306849
 
Evangelical? Are you referring to the GOP Congress under Bush (and Bush) who

Started a war and
lied repeatedly to the people to do it
were caught being corrupt (A freezer full of money comes to mind)
Were caught being immoral (give me the sign under the stall!)
Had NO ethics whatsoever (COUNTLESS examples of lying)
rewarded the banks for bad decisions at the taxpayer's expense

Not that the Democrats are any better.

It doesn't matter who the next President is. Both candidates will be part of the same messed up system. The system guarantees it by shutting out anyone who really wants to fix the mess.

I think the definition of a good politician is someone who can lie with sincerity. On that basis Obama isn't that bad.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (256440)6/24/2010 9:56:32 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 306849
 
Well, Romney's running again, I think that's pretty obvious.

We'll see though. The Tea baggers don't like him much and neither do the fundametalists Christians. Hard to carry the day with the Repugs with that combination.