Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (8057)	2/21/1998 7:22:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20981

Okay. Isn't taht what I said? But nobody believes a woman about this stuff... In the end, you'd only have half a head. If that. I've asked before, and I ask again: WHY do so many people on this thead want, and I mean really want to believe this sort of silly stuff? Bill's no hero, but I fail to understand why he excites so much visceral hatred among so many (or so few, if the polls are to be believed). I detested Nixon, but did at least try to be objective, and didn't go in for every crackpot theory that came along. Not that I actually recall any: Watergate was quite enough. But had it been bruited about that he'd snuffed hundreds of people in California, or a few in Georgetown, well, nooooo, sorry...

To: Ish who wrote (8057)	2/22/1998 3:39:00 PM
From: halfscot	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20981

<With a standard .45 there would be no skull, believe me on this.> Not necessarily. Remember the famous (infamous?) film of the S. Vietnamese general shooting the suspected Viet Cong in the head during the Vietnam war? He was using a 357 magnum, a much higher velocity bullet than a standard .45, at very close range and there was no exit of the bullet in that case. Now, a high velocity rifle bullet like a 30.06 for instance would do just as you asserted even at long range. Yes, a .22 short would be just as effective but is not the standard issue weapon of the military. I think it is still the .45. Besides, like others on this thread I wonder aloud why? This also begs the question: why not an autopsy? This would silence all the doubts once and for all if the hole were determined to have been created by on object on the plane. There has no explanation, plausible or otherwise, for the reason for no autopsy. Just do the autopsy and let the chips fall where they may. Let's determine where the hole came from and then go from there. halfscot