Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: halfscot who wrote (10608)	3/15/1998 10:47:00 AM
From: anyer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

I think your right that he may get off without even a drop in the polls. This is crazy time in America. Just remember when you sign your tax return and it says "under penalty of perjury' THAT THE PERJURY LAW IS ONLY ON THE BOOKS TO SEE WHO WILL BLINK FIRST. When was the last time you saw anyone convicted of perjury; in whose lifetime, certainly not in the lifetime of a knowledgeable Clinton lawyer? 15 of his 18 cabinet appointments were lawyers; they are routinely trained in law school how to distort and camouflage. Yes LIE. So now let's take a poll! How many really believe that if they contribute to a Roth IRA, they will see the money? They keep changing the laws on IRA,s. There is a good reason they don't want a flat tax; it would be harder to change the law if ever enacted. When I was young, when my friends kept changing the rules we played by, I decided not to play any more with them. More and more retirement out of the US looks like the way to go; when over 1/2 the people will tolerate and even worship a liar,that is a deafening statistic. The demographics will overwhelm any IRA that these people can use to deceive. They will just change the law when times get hard. Sure I know this a new era; times will always be good. Right! Imagine what the polls said about Adolph in Germany in the 1930s! 70% anyone. Regards, Anyer

To: halfscot who wrote (10608)	3/15/1998 2:44:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

She refused the invitation. It's the old 'history of past actions' consistent with the present that's about to bite him in the ass big time. But you miss my point. Simply sending one's bodyguard to ask a woman if she'd like to meet him is not a crime. Subsequently having it off with her, had that happened, is not a crime either. Your friend did what most women would do: realized what he wanted and just said no thank you. VERY few would be dumb enough to believe he wanted, say, to talk about the situation in Bosnia. So if you say "yes", you're tacitly acknowledging either that you know what's up (so to speak) and are interested (for the experience, or for possible financial gain), or that you're absolutely braindead.