Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CellularVision (CVUS): 2-way LMDS wireless cable. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bernard Levy who wrote (1593)	3/18/1998 9:55:00 PM
From: Judith Weintraub	Respond to of 2063

Is there any way to get in contact with any of the members of the board - seems to be that we need to get to them to get better management - how about it?

To: Bernard Levy who wrote (1593)	3/18/1998 10:10:00 PM
From: Night Writer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2063

Bernard, The idea with CT&T was to sell LMDS rights on an international basis. Line up venders for all of the companies in a large pool to furnish equipment such as antenna / transmitters, and high speed modems. Good deal for equipment providers. They get to ramp up fast on products. Good deal for operators. They get affordable prices.Good deal for limited partners. They get a return on their considerable R&D expenses. CVUS started with IPO, and no liability for prior R&D expense. I'm working from memory, but believe some of limited partners may include Bell Atlantic, and Phillips Electronics. This is before NYNEX Bell Atlantic merger. I also recall a few exBell Atlantic Officers on CVUS staff. President before Shant was an exPhillips executive. Shant took over again when he passed away. I don't know, but Bell Atlantic ownership interest could have been a problem with the FCC. These people worked long and hard to get LMDS up and running with the FCC, so they knew the ins and outs early on in the game. I think the Bell Atlantic connection may have greased the telephone resale license with NYNEX. It came very fast after successful field trials. NYNEX and Bell were starting to publicly talk merger at the time. I could not find much on limited partnership members when I was actively researching CVUS last year. My personal read of the situation is CT&T is key to contracting services to others. NW

To: Bernard Levy who wrote (1593)	3/18/1998 10:27:00 PM
From: Night Writer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2063

Bernard, Here is another thought for consideration at this time. It is a good post to a very active thread that does a lot research on their favorite stock. NW Message 3751024

To: Bernard Levy who wrote (1593)	3/19/1998 8:46:00 AM
From: James Fink	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2063

If anyone hasn't figured it out by now, Karl Schwarzchild is the alias for Shant Hovnanian, CEO of CVUS. This fact is made obvious for two reasons: (1) Schwarzchild/Shant is the ONLY PERSON ON EARTH who would have the nerve to defend the parasitic CT&T "agreement" with CVUS. CT&T is bleeding CVUS dry and Schwarzchild/Shant loves it! (2) Schwarzchild/Shant spends every waking moment on this thread hyping CVUS (and the CT&T parasite). This makes sense, given that a CEO that actually spent time on improving his company's business would have CVUS at $10 per share right now. ÿ

To: Bernard Levy who wrote (1593)	3/19/1998 10:02:00 AM
From: Frank Duda	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2063

Bernard and all on this thread, Not very good news from perezj_2000 on Yahoo concerning the state of CVUS internet service. Said there has been a problem with service and support since December, and even after repeated e-mails to CVUS it has not been corrected. Also suspects other customers may be having similar problems with the service and/or support. Did not mention exactly what the problem was. Do you have any thoughts on this, or anyone else for that matter, Jim, Karl, NW, Hiram, Tech head, and anyone I neglected to mention? Thanks. Frank