SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SirVinny who wrote (34971)5/6/1999 12:03:00 AM
From: Tokyo VD  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
SirVinny,

There is no such thing as an "innocent investor". It is gambling at its best for people who fail to perform the necessary due diligence. Greed and avarice lead those people to their fate.

Good luck.

Tokyo



To: SirVinny who wrote (34971)5/6/1999 12:14:00 AM
From: Druss  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Sir Vinny--There is a measure of truth to what you say but other factors certainly enter in.
A scam stock allowed to run the course plotted by the criminals running it, maximizes the damage done. The number of naive investors taken can be huge. BRE-X had it been exposed early might have taken in a few million dollars instead of billions.
To my mind the sooner exposed the better. It limits the damage to the innocent, offers the best chance of arresting the criminals involved and getting some of the money stolen returned.
All the Best
Druss



To: SirVinny who wrote (34971)5/6/1999 12:25:00 AM
From: Anthony@Pacific  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
NO it has to be done quickly and harshly..because I cant usually sdave trhe momops and pops that refuse to take my advice and who want tio hold on..But I can prevent hundreds of future investors from getting ij like USAT..inj that one I killed it in a few weeks