SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
DOCS - A TURNAROUND PLAY
An SI Board Since December 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1156 3 0 DOCS
Emcee:  Andrew Q. Viet Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1006 Say NO to Rubin (Page 2) Why should we support Rubin with this merger? I intenAlly-3/8/1999
1005 Say NO to Rubin (Page 1) Sultan, Took time this weekend to review the merger Ally-3/8/1999
1004 Check this out. ottawacitizen.com FORM reference I understand, but I still doSultan-3/8/1999
1003 Michael, Probably was taking it the wrong way - sorry, no worries! Michael Watkins-3/8/1999
1002 Now Now Michael .... I didn't know you cared! I am still trying to see allMichael Pascoe-3/8/1999
1001 Hey Michael, what do you really think? You must have an opinion. To: Sultan KaMichael Watkins-3/8/1999
1000Message 8194816 Message 8194891 Looks like HUMC is warming up to the merger witSultan-3/7/1999
999 I look at this deal, and HUMC has hinted this already, as HUM now has three linSultan-3/7/1999
998 Negative talk from the HUMC thread: Message 8183104Michael Pascoe-3/7/1999
997 Ignore BI + KM comment in the previous post. Not a good day. I tried to add morSultan-3/6/1999
996 KM + BI = HUMBUG When technology companies become value play, then something iSultan-3/6/1999
995 Ally, So many questions! Since you provided all the answers, I'll only ansMichael Watkins-3/5/1999
994 Michael, How the world unfolds! Questions: 1. Why would DOC with $50 over mAlly-3/5/1999
993 KM World amazes and puts out an article on the same day. BI vendor HummingbirdMichael Watkins-3/5/1999
992 I'm still digesting this whole thing. I'll comment briefly on the "Michael Watkins-3/5/1999
991 Break up fee of 4% of equity of dxx, which the way dxx is trading might not resTrader Bob-3/5/1999
990 Article in Aussie trade magazine: Reprinted with permission from Image & DMichael Watkins-3/5/1999
989 Put two underperforming companies, and what do you get? A BIGGER under-performiAlly-3/5/1999
988 Subject: Think YOU'RE having a bad day? THINK AGAIN... A man was working waitwatchwander-3/5/1999
987 Sultan, I'm relatively sure that neither set of shareholders will go againMichael Watkins-3/5/1999
986 This is a done deal and very little chance that HUM share holders will reject iSultan-3/5/1999
985 Not if HUMC shareholders don't like it! Which the few that have traded so fMichael Watkins-3/5/1999
984 Correct me if I'm wrong but if this is a done deal, it appears the gap we sLetmebe Frank-3/5/1999
983 Hello NF: When you look at both stocks over a year, I have to wonder how long Letmebe Frank-3/5/1999
982 The good news is they now have Access to e-nuff cash to take out any cummer, exwaitwatchwander-3/5/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News