SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Southwall Technologies
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1143 10 0 SWTX
Emcee:  Skeeter Bug Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1018tbf, my guess is that orders were cut. period. more computer monitors than eveSkeeter Bug-1/17/2001
1017>>therfore, they do not need to spend more to hire the Europeans. This is Skeeter Bug-1/17/2001
1016If they can't lower the cost their business will be replaced by those can. IWade-1/16/2001
1015Skeeter, <if the sent 55 guys to Europe and laid off 55 guys in the us, how Wade-1/16/2001
1014I do not agree with your assessment at all. A/R film for monitors is manufacturTBF-1/16/2001
1013>>What they did was to shift production to Europe<< wade, if the seSkeeter Bug-1/15/2001
1012This big lay off was to my surprise. What they did was to shift production to EuWade-1/15/2001
1011comments? siliconinvestor.com $3,000,000 / 55 people = $55k per person releaseSkeeter Bug-1/15/2001
1010better 4 years late than never.Skeeter Bug-1/3/2001
1009To all, There is a very good post on Raging Bull that someone had with somebodyTBF-1/3/2001
1008I would be very surprised that they have anything new to report. Happy new year.Wade-12/31/2000
1007Has anyone seen the recent investment report prepared by Needham? Any useful insTBF-12/31/2000
1006Agreed. I would like to know what was really changed besides they got a new CFWade-12/29/2000
1005to all: received a note re: swtx from someone more familiar with the company thaSkeeter Bug-12/29/2000
1004tbf, "visibility" is not something this management team has shown. i Skeeter Bug-12/28/2000
1003I believe that by the end of this q4, all PMs in Tempe and Palo Alto will be capTBF-12/28/2000
1002wade, the machines aren't the problem, the buyers are. guess what? we are Skeeter Bug-12/19/2000
1001Hi Dude, Their inefficiency in production is partially due to poor machine desiWade-12/9/2000
1000tbf, i'd think the #1 goal of this company would be to stay solvent. screw Skeeter Bug-12/9/2000
999I suspect management is reviewing alternatives, if any, in a sophisticated and rTBF-12/8/2000
998to all: >>Southwall said that it continues to work with its investment baSkeeter Bug-12/8/2000
997td, agreed. i'm letting it ride at current levels - though it is probably aSkeeter Bug-12/1/2000
996I was traveling this week and forgot my laptop(left it home)and didn't even Arthur Radley-12/1/2000
995wade, i don't think they screw up another report. to do so may pierce the cSkeeter Bug-12/1/2000
994Hi Mike, They had all of the ingredients, except high level management team, to Wade-12/1/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):