SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Micro Circuits Corp (AMCC)
An SI Board Since November 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1805 111 0 AMCC
Emcee:  Dave Grady Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1030Amazing Ray. You throw all kind of technobabble in that post which would make onwho cares?-12/3/2000
1029Hi CMB, You seem to be an optimist at this juncture. You commend Trader Dave fRaymond Duray-12/3/2000
1028Raymond, You seem to have completely missed the point of my analogy which doesn&who cares?-12/3/2000
1027OT: Auto-nation Hi stevieD, Looking at NAPM data, one might conclude that BriRaymond Duray-12/3/2000
1026Hi C.M., Perhaps you are correct, perhaps AMCC will continue to grow at an excRaymond Duray-12/3/2000
1025Bob Brinker agrees with you, almost. He says bear market started Jan00 and will stevieD-12/3/2000
1024I guess the merchant cycle doesn't matter or the shift in mix of total capexTrader Dave-12/3/2000
1023If tonight I invent a car that runs on water, is made out of plastic, costs 1/2 who cares?-12/3/2000
1022Ides of March.Raymond Duray-12/2/2000
1021I can't call a bottom Ray. How long? 2 1/2 months is your prediction? TAtechanalyst1-12/2/2000
1020I agree and disagree. What you are observing is the natural decay of IPOs, they Raymond Duray-12/2/2000
1019Hi Dave, <i>what does that have to do with amcc? </i> Telecom coRaymond Duray-12/2/2000
1018No Ray, I haven't been asleep. Most of the market was NOT making new highs atechanalyst1-12/2/2000
1017OT: Back to macroeconomics, since AMCC is held hostage. Hi techanalyst1, <Raymond Duray-12/2/2000
1016what does that have to do with amcc?Trader Dave-12/2/2000
1015Hi Dave, Take a look at NT's growth rate about 3-4 years ago. -RayRaymond Duray-12/2/2000
1014Do you know where the term "rosacea" came from? It's the latin fortechanalyst1-12/2/2000
1013I'm not sure i understand. you think AMCC is headed for 5% annual revenue gTrader Dave-12/2/2000
1012Steve, Big picture: We have just gone through a mania, a bubble, an episode inRaymond Duray-12/2/2000
1011Hi Ray, I heard him make those comments. Kinda scary, as I've followed hisSJS-12/2/2000
1010Hi BB, <i>i think i will give myself a early x-mas present and get a lobRaymond Duray-12/2/2000
1009here's a laugh. did you check out the trifecta the clown at lehman pulled tBeltropolis Boy-12/2/2000
1008Does anybody have access to this full report? twst.comDon Miller-11/29/2000
1007Looks like I got that one wrong-DOH! When we do finally reach a bottom here, I Lodi-11/28/2000
1006Institutional Ownership was up huge as of 9/30/00 This website will show you (aDon Miller-11/28/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):