SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
EDTA (was GIFT)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2383 14 0 EDTA
Emcee:  Mel Spivak Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1033 Howard, Thanks. Why is the defendant going first (and last) rather than the pGRC-4/28/1997
1032 Defendants were supposed to have filed on 4/21.Howard Kallman-4/28/1997
1031 Charles, My earlier post of the docket entry omitted one line. The reply brieGRC-4/25/1997
1030 GRC, So, if it takes until 2001, then the patent will have been expired and alBagladdy-4/25/1997
1029 Scott, Worse, the original order had given the infringers a chance to reply.GRC-4/24/1997
1028 What is that--english for you guys who are beiing sued will have till 6/27 to sScott Ozer-4/24/1997
1027 GRC, thankyou for the information. It's to bad the court has to keep delayiPaul R. Drahota-4/24/1997
1026 Paul, The latest docket entry indicates there will be a delay. 4/17/97 111 GRC-4/24/1997
1025 Scott, usually takes a couple of days afterward. Should here something in a couPaul R. Drahota-4/23/1997
1024 Howard, wish I heard. Just logged on now. I'll look around and let you knowPaul R. Drahota-4/23/1997
1023 Thanks..should be soon till we hear something.Scott Ozer-4/23/1997
1022 Here is a copy of the December 23, 1996 from E-Data re the timeline: <<SHoward Kallman-4/23/1997
1021 Could someone please put up a time line of events to refresh our memories?Scott Ozer-4/23/1997
1020 I have not heard anything lately. June 4th was the date they come to court to,Mel Spivak-4/23/1997
1019 Have the Defendants asked for or have they received a continuance? Anybody?Howard Kallman-4/22/1997
1018 what happened?? no news out.Scott Ozer-4/22/1997
1017 Well, 1 down, two more dates to go... May 22nd and June 4th, hopefully the landPaul R. Drahota-4/22/1997
1016 Could it be that at these affordable prices, everyone who is willing to gamble Steven Durrington-4/20/1997
1015 All: With all due respect for the patent interpretations, I remain curious abodoormouse-4/18/1997
1014 Awesome patent claim lesson, GRC! Much appreciated. MelMel Spivak-4/17/1997
1013 Brad, I hope this is possible to explain without getting to wrapped up in patGRC-4/17/1997
1012 GRC, If the the claim does not require payment then could you please explain paBrad Brown-4/17/1997
1011 Brad, Here is a comparison that shows why I think an explorer download infrinGRC-4/17/1997
1010 Brad, Infringement requires that someone makes, uses or sells at least one patGRC-4/17/1997
1009 <Is anyone familiar with compuserve? Does it use its own net? Has it always?MENSO-4/16/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):