SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Neocon's Seminar Thread
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1112 21 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1037Damn subversive poets. I wouldn't want to live in a society without em thougTom Clarke-11/5/2004
1036Because they lie about the gods, showing them as licentious and venal.Neocon-11/5/2004
1035Recently read that Plato would have banned poets from his republic. Now why woulTom Clarke-11/4/2004
1034Legal Obligation and Authority plato.stanford.edu Sovereignty plato.stanford.TimF-11/4/2004
1033The islamicists wouldn't recognize any philosopher kings after Mohammed. ItTigerPaw-11/1/2004
1032Strauss was just ticked off because Islamicists wouldn't wear Levis.one_less-11/1/2004
1031Another dumb bunny makes shit up.......Neocon-10/26/2004
1030Straussian conservatism had a previously unsuspected amount in common with IslamTigerPaw-10/25/2004
1029Right. The elephant problem...the blind men each touching a different part of thone_less-6/25/2004
1028The question then becomes when is one aspect of justice denied. Ask 3 people aTimF-6/25/2004
1027<i>"In such a situation you would have 'justice for all' and one_less-6/25/2004
1026Anyway, I have to run an errand. I may peek in during the weekend, hard to say. Neocon-6/25/2004
1025<I> In the discussion you have been involved in 'freedom of associatiTimF-6/25/2004
1024<i>"Only God could solve that equation successfully."</i> one_less-6/25/2004
1023<i>"And even if we are in such a situation we, like the 5 year old, wone_less-6/25/2004
1022I disagree with your definition of "perfect justice". Perfect justice Neocon-6/25/2004
1021<i>"What do you think of my other topic: "Librae of Justice"one_less-6/25/2004
1020<i> The definition of perfect justice I gave was not meant to be interpretTimF-6/25/2004
1019<i>"No. I am saying that if one person's needs are not met then ione_less-6/25/2004
1018<i> I was speaking of a transcendent definition of justice not a practicalTimF-6/25/2004
1017<i>"Perfect justice is when everyone's needs are being met absoluone_less-6/25/2004
1016<i> Perfect justice is when everyone's needs are being met absolutely TimF-6/25/2004
1015Yes, at least on the conceptual level. When the statement "All men are creone_less-6/25/2004
1014If what constitutes justice for all could be settled definitively, then obligatiNeocon-6/25/2004
1013The concept that I presented looks at them differently. Not as individual concepone_less-6/25/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):