SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Etec Systems moving up
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1279 13 0 ETEC
Emcee:  Manas Pattanaik Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1054 Here is an interesting post from Carl Johnson, the respected head of InfrastrucCarl R.-8/1/1998
1053 Align-Rite International Inc. (MASK) : CIBC Oppenheimer upgrades maker and marA. Edwards-7/31/1998
1052 What about copper technology, does it change something for ETEC ?(No name provided)-7/26/1998
1051 Devices (memory, cpus, video chips, etc) get more complex all the time, which mCarl R.-7/25/1998
1050 can someone tell me how the transition to larger wafer size and the transition Henry D-7/24/1998
1049 Jeffrey: In the mid-late '80s, the mask generators were a number of years sage-7/21/1998
1048 Sage, you seem too have much more tech knowledge than me. You saw my point thatjeffbas-7/20/1998
1047 Jeffrey: I believe the real reason for Etec's lethargic sales in the priorsage-7/20/1998
1046 You have hit on one of my favorite subjects here. I suggest that you take a lojeffbas-7/19/1998
1045 Ditto. But remember that the market almost always over reacts to perceived thrCarl R.-7/19/1998
1044 Excellent Point Astutely Made JMHO It seems reasinable on top of all that. Brobert b furman-7/19/1998
1043 Jeff, "...the potential for development of new processes that obsolete orDr. Bob-7/19/1998
1042 This is the key paragraph: "IBM researchers believe that it this techniqujeffbas-7/19/1998
1041 Thread, Any estimates on impact, if any, of IBM light stamps on demand foIan@SI-7/18/1998
1040 "- 28 - 40 range is my guess. Someone with guts could probably make some mThe ChrisMeister-7/17/1998
1039 Nice analysis, Bob. Also don't forget the warning already about the first hjeffbas-7/16/1998
1038 I think we're in a trading range until the sector declares itself - 28 - 40Dr. Bob-7/16/1998
1037 T. Sherman, it sounds like you conversation with ETEC was quite positive. To hSparky65-7/16/1998
1036 bought my first batch of etec today at 33. going much higher. these guys havBrad Rogers-7/15/1998
1035 I just want to clarify that the $3 plus estimate is for Calender 99, not FiscalT.Sherman-7/15/1998
1034 Jeff, I had this discussion with the COO of ETEC and the consensus is that theT.Sherman-7/15/1998
1033 Etec Systems Announces Next Generation MEBES 5000 for 0.18 Micron Masks ÿThe ChrisMeister-7/14/1998
1032 Seems transition to 300mm might be delayed : techstocks.com What impact on ESoren-7/14/1998
1031 Any comments on Needham & Co's downgrade from buy to hold? Eric Jorgenson-7/14/1998
1030 "...The semi makers need money to buy equipment." I see it a little The ChrisMeister-7/14/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):