SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10668Ted, did you see the speculation on selling MCI? : marketwatch.com . Maybe killRichard Mazzarella-6/17/2002
10667Notebaert Succeeds Nacchio as Chairman and CEO of Qwest Communications DENVER, tejek-6/17/2002
10666Personally I do think WCOM has been a "victim" of the times. Many maBEEF JERKEY-6/17/2002
10665That is a particularly excellent link - it really show "who" the interBEEF JERKEY-6/17/2002
10664<i>I see a double in a couple of months, if not before.</I> I don&#tejek-6/17/2002
10663<i>So where to from here? My WAG, for what it's worth, is it's cletejek-6/17/2002
10662cbs.marketwatch.commatt dillabough-6/17/2002
10661Ted, I think the short's hope is the $5b funding does not materialize. (I thRichard Mazzarella-6/17/2002
10660<i>The short told us a lot of other crap. Listening closely to Worldcom matejek-6/16/2002
10659Being a member of si does not confer the ability to decifer incoherency. c.hinton-6/16/2002
10658chinton, you have been an SI member long enough to understand my statement. If nRichard Mazzarella-6/16/2002
10657Chinton: <i>The problems originate at wcom...</i> Oh, boy, is thJohn Curtis-6/16/2002
10656Tejek: <i>Since it appears the level of short interest has dropped in recJohn Curtis-6/16/2002
10655"Imo the percieved wcom risk is in the price,the perception is wrong."c.hinton-6/16/2002
10654chinton, yes, I see, you must be more objective than me. <LOL> I didn'Richard Mazzarella-6/16/2002
10653I am just pointing out that wcom share price is not all the fault of shorts.The c.hinton-6/16/2002
10652chinton, don't get so uptight, I'm just making an argument, follow the tRichard Mazzarella-6/16/2002
10651it is interesting the way you believe that anybody who critisises wcom must be sc.hinton-6/16/2002
10650Nice find, Lizzie. Gotta be missing some data on a few, like C&W, but does dOeconomicus-6/16/2002
10649tejek, I think there was a lot of good news from the meeting for anyone listeninRichard Mazzarella-6/15/2002
10648here's something interesting (copied from a yahoo post) caida.org On the fLizzie Tudor-6/15/2002
10647<i>I was wishful thinking assuming WCOM would be announcing wonderful newstejek-6/15/2002
10646The way I had it figured net net right now WCOM should have a a cash position ofBEEF JERKEY-6/15/2002
10645the weather was different then. now, the boat is perceived to be in choppy seas.hdl-6/15/2002
10644I am afraid that the popular market psycology of buy the dip have led many down c.hinton-6/15/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News