SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10768three huge trades just went through on WCOM AH. 9 mil and 8 mil and 1.6 mil. TRon Dior-6/24/2002
10767shoe, looks like the funding sources want Worldcom to dance to their tune, not WRichard Mazzarella-6/24/2002
10766"Worldcom should immediately draw down that $1.5b that will soon expire andJames Calladine-6/24/2002
10765Regarding Grubman, see this Reuters article: biz.yahoo.com One analyst, who asshoe-6/24/2002
10764It's amazing to see a fourth of this company disappear on something Grubman mike thomas-6/24/2002
10763RD, if these shorts want to play hardball, maybe Worldcom should immediately draRichard Mazzarella-6/24/2002
10762Anyone find it amusing that people are listening to Grubman now?Oeconomicus-6/24/2002
10761And no sooner did I type the prior message than SSB comes out downgrading WCOM tJohn Curtis-6/24/2002
10760I agree re the "no evil conspiracy" comment, but I do think there'Oeconomicus-6/24/2002
10759Richard, et.al.: <i>They also underestimate the forces working to destroyJohn Curtis-6/24/2002
10758they r giving u a chance to load up cheap, make a fortune and go to portofino orhdl-6/23/2002
10757hdl, I think we could see $2-2.50 on a squeeze, $5 soon on a good business plan.Richard Mazzarella-6/23/2002
10756how high will wcom go when the shorts are squeezed?hdl-6/23/2002
10755RD, <<This is not a default of any sort, much as the shorts would like to Richard Mazzarella-6/23/2002
10754chinton, <<this is my last posting ,for the time being>> Somehow we Richard Mazzarella-6/23/2002
10753That is how banks are, when you don't need it, they want to provide it, but James Calladine-6/23/2002
10752Before, the bank give all the green light for the money more than you even needehui zhou-6/22/2002
10751Here is the question I submitted. Perhaps others on this thread have comments. shoe-6/22/2002
10750Fair enough.SofaSpud-6/22/2002
10749I wouldn't say I have "faith" in the rating agencies. I think someJames Calladine-6/22/2002
10748Your faith in the rating agencies is interesting. Yes, they may have a superiorSofaSpud-6/22/2002
10747I stand by my original comments, although the point you make about these securitJames Calladine-6/22/2002
10746<i>it is a very SERIOUS situation when any company fails to meet its debt Oeconomicus-6/22/2002
10745<i>its hard to argue reasonably to people who seem to be in denile.</i&Oeconomicus-6/22/2002
10744I would echo your comments. I have NO idea what will be the future of WCOM, howJames Calladine-6/22/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News