Applied Magnetics Corp | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp

An SI Board Since September 1995

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
12298	24	0	APM

Emcee: Raymond Thomas	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
10923	re: He did say they have an excellent relation with WDC and that cutbacks are t	Think4Yourself	-	12/10/1997
10922	Ken: This is given in the SEC filing that I posted here. Sankar	Rational	-	12/9/1997
10921	Don: <i> If they need to raise cash they are already approved for up to	Rational	-	12/9/1997
10920	Brain, He called me back today. I find it difficult in the middle of my work to	Steve Pick	-	12/9/1997
10919	Any idea on how many shares Crisman and other directors hold? eom	Think4Yourself	-	12/9/1997
10918	MANY investors don't know about the short-short rule right now. There may	Think4Yourself	-	12/9/1997
10917	re: BTW, nice hold-up today at 14 It's not over by any means. Only the be	Think4Yourself	-	12/9/1997
10916	We agree on the increased volatility aspect of the short short rule. I take th	Mark Adams	-	12/9/1997
10915	Hi Bill, I did ask about the relationship with WDC. He was very adament about	Don Earl	-	12/9/1997
10914	The short-short rule, which I followed with great interest when it was approved	Think4Yourself	-	12/9/1997
10913	Don- Your a bright star in a dull day! Thanks so much for your percerverence	hcirteg	-	12/9/1997
10912	JDN, thank you for your candid answer. I just thought the "hostile" b	dppl	-	12/9/1997
10911	Jon, I got the same impression. I did my job, now how about you? Would you be	Brian Lempel	-	12/9/1997
10910	Brian, Good work. I have stuff I want to talk to you about. But I am busy tonig	Jonathan Bird	-	12/9/1997
10909	Dear dppl: Sorry, but I am not informed enough on that potential takeover to j	JDN	-	12/9/1997
10908	Dear Brian: Congrats on your call. I sure couldnt have pulled off anything li	JDN	-	12/9/1997
10907	Dear JonBird: I think perhaps where I differ with many on this thread. One si	JDN	-	12/9/1997
10906	The options looked a bit expensive to go long, and the Market Makers were a bit	Mark Adams	-	12/9/1997
10905	Crisman conversation: Crisman just called back. I would hardly call it a conv	Brian Lempel	-	12/9/1997
10904	Don, Thanks for the info. The usual caveats apply with Crisman making things	William T. Katz	-	12/9/1997
10903	<i>Doubled my position today.</i> Did you also remember to set you	Jonathan Bird	-	12/9/1997
10902	Hi Mark, I'm thinking about a target price in the low to mid 20s, 4-6 mont	Don Earl	-	12/9/1997
10901	Ken, I'm going to call Crisman tonight (as soon as I can get the cheaper ra	Brian Lempel	-	12/9/1997
10900	<I>I read that as "... what OUR customers are buying ...". Agai	Mark Adams	-	12/9/1997
10899	Hi Jon, <Just a warning Don.(sorry,yes another) In the past when people hav	Don Earl	-	12/9/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):