SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11018Intent. Proving intent. Proving intent to puff current earnings to defraud invesBWAC-6/28/2002
11017Namaste means "I bow down to (or salute) the Divine within you. Namaste! James Calladine-6/28/2002
11016<i>Do you feel that is ACCIDENTAL?</i> It may or may not have been paul t-6/28/2002
11015No, not an attorney. "assuming your sentiment is genuine" Are you? James Calladine-6/28/2002
11014<The fact is that journal entries, especially ones this large, can't be hBWAC-6/28/2002
11013Because it came on the heels of Enron and in a bear market. AOL's accountingOeconomicus-6/28/2002
11012This is evident manipulation by SEC. They may halt the trading for few hours buel paradisio-6/28/2002
11011hey, i'll do it for just half the $450k. what's the base salary? ;-)Oeconomicus-6/28/2002
11010PR re Sidgmore letter to President Bush: CLINTON, Miss., June 28 /PRNewswire-FiOeconomicus-6/28/2002
11009Seems funny to me that wcon would want to retain senior management. Any jerk ofmike thomas-6/28/2002
11008suspicious, but circumstantial. are you an attorney? Namaste to you too, assumiOeconomicus-6/28/2002
11007How do you feel about Sullivan PURPORTEDLY adjusting the amounts shifted over toJames Calladine-6/28/2002
11006Sullivan's behavior, as reported by the WSJ yesterday, does not seem to suppOeconomicus-6/28/2002
11005ha! I forgot about that....not bad for not even trying. Thanks, and have a gooNicholas Rauch-6/28/2002
11004I'd say that was abit backwards. <if they've reversed $5 billion ofBWAC-6/28/2002
11003You've only been back a few days and you're already grubbing posts? 1100Oeconomicus-6/28/2002
11002Inquiry Appears to Bolster Fraud Case By KURT EICHENWALD and SIMON ROMERO nytimJames Calladine-6/28/2002
11001Re Xerox: So, if they've reversed $5 billion of revenues ($3B in the Spring,Oeconomicus-6/28/2002
11000The last message was intended for all. NickNicholas Rauch-6/28/2002
10999Good morning. Just a quick note to say that when I started following the marketNicholas Rauch-6/28/2002
10998What's happening for the past week was Sidgmore purging all these that are rEd Zhao-6/28/2002
10997No I would not, but as the time goes by, the possibility's getting lower.Ed Zhao-6/28/2002
10996El: <i>...SEC is afraid,that after WCOM will resume trading,the market wiJohn Curtis-6/28/2002
10995<i>How much do you want to bet that money's gone or hidden some place?tejek-6/28/2002
10994<i>Not the jet!</I> And maybe the skis, too. Its not good to screw tejek-6/28/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News